What If I Don't Treat My PSA-Detected Prostate Cancer? Answers from Three Natural History Models

Background: Making an informed decision about treating a prostate cancer detected after a routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test requires knowledge about disease natural history, such as the chances that it would have been clinically diagnosed in the absence of screening and that it would metastasize or lead to death in the absence of treatment. Methods: We use three independently developed models of prostate cancer natural history to project risks of clinical progression events and disease-specific deaths for PSA-detected cases assuming they receive no primary treatment. Results: The three models project that 20%–33% of men have preclinical onset; of these 38%–50% would be clinically diagnosed and 12%–25% would die of the disease in the absence of screening and primary treatment. The risk that men age less than 60 at PSA detection with Gleason score 2–7 would be clinically diagnosed in the absence of screening is 67%–93% and would die of the disease in the absence of primary treatment is 23%–34%. For Gleason score 8 to 10 these risks are 90%–96% and 63%–83%. Conclusions: Risks of disease progression among untreated PSA-detected cases can be nontrivial, particularly for younger men and men with high Gleason scores. Model projections can be useful for informing decisions about treatment. Impact: This is the first study to project population-based natural history summaries in the absence of screening or primary treatment and risks of clinical progression events following PSA detection in the absence of primary treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(5); 740–50. ©2011 AACR.

[1]  Rascon [The National Cancer Institute]. , 1953, Boletin cultural e informativo - Consejo General de Colegios Medicos de Espana.

[2]  M. Stampfer,et al.  A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer. , 1995, JAMA.

[3]  E. Feuer,et al.  Asymptomatic incidence and duration of prostate cancer. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  E. Feuer,et al.  Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer--part III: Quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  Angela Mariotto,et al.  Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) , 2001, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[6]  Laurence R. Paquette,et al.  Improved prostate cancer-specific survival and other disease parameters: impact of prostate-specific antigen testing. , 2002, Urology.

[7]  S. Harland,et al.  Survival prospects after screen‐detection of prostate cancer , 2002, BJU international.

[8]  Michael M Lieber,et al.  Journal Review , 2003, International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery.

[9]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Lurdes Y T Inoue,et al.  Combining longitudinal studies of PSA. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[11]  Jaime Pujadas Oláno,et al.  Natural history of early localized prostate cancer. , 2004, JAMA.

[12]  James A Hanley,et al.  Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  P. Walsh,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[14]  James A Hanley,et al.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2005, JAMA.

[15]  Barnett S Kramer,et al.  Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[16]  A Tsodikov,et al.  A population model of prostate cancer incidence , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  A model of the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer, and the effect of radical treatment on overall survival , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Gleason score, age and screening: Modeling dedifferentiation in prostate cancer , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[19]  E. Feuer,et al.  Reconstructing PSA testing patterns between black and white men in the US from Medicare claims and the National Health Interview Survey , 2007, Cancer.

[20]  Dante diTommaso,et al.  Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline , 2008, Cancer Causes & Control.

[21]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Estimating Lead Time and Overdiagnosis Associated with PSA Screening from Prostate Cancer Incidence Trends , 2008, Biometrics.

[22]  P. Albertsen Predicting survival for men with clinically localized prostate cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[23]  Seth Falcon,et al.  Impact of PSA Screening on the Incidence of Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer in the United States: A Surveillance Modeling Approach , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[24]  T. Wilt,et al.  Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness and Harms of Treatments for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  Peter Müller,et al.  Modeling Disease Progression With Longitudinal Markers , 2008, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[26]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Nomogram incorporating PSA level to predict cancer‐specific survival for men with clinically localized prostate cancer managed without curative intent , 2008, Cancer.

[27]  A. Tsodikov,et al.  Stage‐specific cancer incidence: An artificially mixed multinomial logit model , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  A. Kibel Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context , 2009 .

[31]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Calibrating disease progression models using population data: a critical precursor to policy development in cancer control. , 2010, Biostatistics.

[32]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  A. Wein,et al.  Campbell-Walsh Urology , 2011 .

[34]  I. Thompson,et al.  Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention of Prostate Cancer , 2012 .