On the Constructive Role of Multi-Criteria Analysis in Nuclear Emergency Management

In this chapter we argue that multi-criteria analysis, as an iterative process, can be a useful instrument for improving decision-making in complex societal problems. As a possible application, we focus on the management of contaminated milk following an accidental radioactive release to the environment. We describe a stakeholder process for the development of a multi-criteria decision aid model and we show that the related problem structuring has led to the exploration of some new research topics, in order to gain more insight in the factors that can contribute to a successful countermeasure strategy. Such results have on the one hand a clarifying role in a comprehensive multi-criteria analysis and, on the other hand, they highlight practical implications for decision-making, including communication on potential countermeasure strategies both between various stakeholders and with the general public.

[1]  Valentin Bertsch,et al.  Moderated Decision Support and Countermeasure Planning for Off-Site Emergency Management , 2005 .

[2]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  S French,et al.  Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding , 1996 .

[5]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas , 1993 .

[6]  R P Hämäläinen,et al.  Multiattribute Risk Analysis in Nuclear Emergency Management , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Simon French,et al.  Decision conferencing and the International Chernobyl Project , 1992 .

[8]  Simon French,et al.  Multi‐attribute decision support in the event of a nuclear accident , 1996 .

[9]  J. Hunt,et al.  The STRATEGY project: decision tools to aid sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated agricultural ecosystems. , 2005, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[10]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Robust solutions and methods in decision‐aid , 1999 .

[11]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst , 2006 .

[12]  Jeffrey E. Kottemann,et al.  Decisional Conflict and User Acceptance of Multicriteria Decision-Making Aids , 1991 .

[13]  M D Christou,et al.  Land-use planning in the vicinity of chemical sites: risk-informed decision making at a local community level. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[14]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Robust and neutral methods for aggregating preferences into an outranking relation , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  B. Roy,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Analysing the Notion of Relative Importance of Criteria , 1996 .

[16]  B. Roy.  Decision-aid and decision-making , 1990 .

[17]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[18]  Catrinel Turcanu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aiding model for the evaluation of agricultural countermeasures after an accidental release of radionuclides to the environment , 2007 .

[19]  Daniel Vanderpooten,et al.  Aggregation of dispersed consequences for constructing criteria: The evaluation of flood risk reduction strategies , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  C. Turcanu,et al.  Agricultural countermeasures in nuclear emergency management: a stakeholders' survey for multi-criteria model development , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  Patrice Perny,et al.  An interactive multiobjective procedure for selecting medium‐term countermeasures after nuclear accidents , 1998 .

[22]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Multicriteria Decision-Aid , 1992 .

[23]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment , 1995 .

[24]  Yves De Smet,et al.  About the applicability of MCDA to some robustness problems , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Pedro C. Borges,et al.  Avoiding academic and decorative planning in GHG emissions abatement studies with MCDA: : The Peruvian case , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Kathryn A. Higley,et al.  Environmental consequences of the chernobyl accident and their remediation: twenty years of experience. Report of the chernobyl forum expert group ‘environment’ STI/PUB/1239, 2006, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria ISBN: 92-0-114705-8, 166 pp, 40.00 Euros (softbound) , 2006 .

[27]  Maurice Landry,et al.  A stakeholder approach to MCDA , 1998 .

[28]  C. Turcanu,et al.  On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis , 2007 .

[29]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Structuring Objectives for Problems of Public Interest , 1988, Oper. Res..

[30]  C. Turcanu,et al.  Risk perception of the Belgian population : Results of the public opinion survey in 2006 , 2007 .

[31]  B. Roy.  Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision , 1985 .

[32]  Catrinel Turcanu,et al.  Food safety and acceptance of management options after radiological contaminations of the food chain , 2007 .

[33]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[34]  L. Phillips,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: a manual , 2009 .