The effect of information literacy on physical education students' perception of a course management system

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of information literacy on students' perception toward the educational services offered by an asynchronous course management system (e-Class) for the support of the traditional instruction method in tertiary physical education (PE) institutions. Participants were 211 PE students between the ages of 19 and 24 years, who were sorted into three groups according to their information literacy level: high, medium, and low users of technology. Data was collected using an online survey during a one-week period. One-way analyses of variances (ANOVAs) revealed significant differences between the three user groups, in each factor of the perception questionnaire: ‘interaction’, ‘participation’, ‘educational material’, ‘usefulness,’ and ‘user control’. In the above factors, the high and medium user groups reported better results than the low-technology user group. In conclusion, learner familiarity with computer and online technologies made positive contributions to their perception toward course management systems. Hence, it is essential that physical education students should have basic information technology skills to feel more satisfied with their online learning experiences.

[1]  Brigitte Maier,et al.  Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[2]  J. Arbaugh Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[4]  Gary Packham,et al.  An Initial Evaluation of Student Withdrawals within an e-Learning Environment: The Case of e-College Wales. , 2004 .

[5]  D. Bolliger,et al.  Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education , 2009 .

[6]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Nicole A. Buzzetto-More Student Perceptions of Various E-Learning Components , 2008 .

[8]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[9]  Thomas S. Westbrook Changes in Student Attitudes toward Graduate Instruction via Web-based Delivery. , 1999 .

[10]  Nicole A. Buzzetto-More,et al.  Incorporating the Hybrid Learning Model into Minority Education at a Historically Black University , 2006, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[11]  Kyung-Sun Kim,et al.  Web-based learning: Factors affecting students' satisfaction and learning experience , 2005, First Monday.

[12]  Kian-Sam Hong,et al.  Students' attitudes toward the use of the Internet for learning: A study at a university in Malaysia , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  Eric Bray,et al.  Predictors of Learning Satisfaction in Japanese Online Distance Learners. , 2008 .

[14]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  The role of experience and innovation characteristics in the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Pei-Chun Shih,et al.  The effect of previous experience with information and communication technologies on performance in a Web-based learning program , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  D. Weaver,et al.  Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality , 2008 .

[18]  J. Elen,et al.  Effects of Gender on Perceptions of and Preferences for Telematic Learning Environments , 1997 .

[19]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  The importance of participant interaction in online environments , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  J. Arbaugh,et al.  A Structural Equation Model of Predictors for Effective Online Learning , 2005 .

[21]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Different experiences, different effects: a longitudinal study of learning a computer program in a network environment , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Douglas F. Hale,et al.  Technicians' Perceptions About Web-Based Courses: The University of Texas System Experience , 2002 .

[23]  Shannon D. Smith,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2009—Key Findings , 2010 .

[24]  Qiuyun Lin Student satisfactions in four mixed courses in elementary teacher education program , 2008 .

[25]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[26]  Borworn Papasratorn,et al.  The Effects of Self-efficacy and Attitude on E-learning Outcomes , 2006 .

[27]  Joe E. Wheaton,et al.  Bridging the Transactional Distance Gap in Online Learning Environments , 2005 .

[28]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation , 2006 .

[29]  Michael P. Menchaca,et al.  RESEARCH ON INTERNET-SUPPORTED LEARNING A Review , 2008 .

[30]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..