Functional Geometry of Human Connectome and Robustness of Gender Differences

Mapping the brain imaging data to networks, where each node represents a specific area of the brain, has enabled an objective graph-theoretic analysis of human connectome. However, the latent structure on higher-order connections remains unexplored, where many brain regions acting in synergy perform complex functions. Here we analyse this hidden structure using the simplicial complexes parametrisation where the shared faces of simplexes encode higher-order relationships between groups of nodes and emerging hyperbolic geometry. Based on data collected within the Human Connectome Project, we perform a systematic analysis of consensus networks of 100 female (F-connectome) and 100 male (M-connectome) subjects by varying the number of fibres launched. Our analysis reveals that the functional geometry of the common F\&M-connectome coincides with the M-connectome and is characterized by a complex architecture of simplexes to the 14th order, which is built in six anatomical communities, and short cycles among them. Furthermore, the F-connectome has additional connections that involve different brain regions, thereby increasing the size of simplexes and introducing new cycles. By providing new insights into the internal organisation of anatomical brain modules as well as into the links between them that are essential to dynamics, these results also highlight the functional gender-related differences

[1]  Coenraad Bron,et al.  Finding all cliques of an undirected graph , 1973 .

[2]  R. H. Atkin,et al.  An Algebra for Patterns on a Complex, I , 1974, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[3]  P. Gould,et al.  Q-Analysis, or a Language of Structure: An Introduction for Social Scientists, Geographers and Planners , 1980, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  L. Freeman Q-analysis and the structure of friendship networks , 1980 .

[5]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Modern Graph Theory , 2002, Graduate Texts in Mathematics.

[6]  José M. Rodríguez,et al.  Gromov hyperbolicity through decomposition of metric spaces , 2004 .

[7]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  H. Bandelt,et al.  Metric graph theory and geometry: a survey , 2006 .

[9]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Horvath,et al.  Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Milan Rajkovic,et al.  Simplicial Complexes of Networks and Their Statistical Properties , 2008, ICCS.

[12]  M. Habib,et al.  Notes on diameters , centers , and approximating trees of δ-hyperbolic geodesic spaces and graphs , 2008 .

[13]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[14]  M. Mitrovic,et al.  Spectral and dynamical properties in classes of sparse networks with mesoscopic inhomogeneities. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Modular and Hierarchically Modular Organization of Brain Networks , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[17]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[18]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Characterizing the Community Structure of Complex Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Lectures on Complex Networks , 2010 .

[20]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Graph-theory based parcellation of functional subunits in the brain from resting-state fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Benjamin Thyreau,et al.  Correlations among Brain Gray Matter Volumes, Age, Gender, and Hemisphere in Healthy Individuals , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  Yaokun Wu,et al.  Hyperbolicity and Chordality of a Graph , 2011, Electron. J. Comb..

[23]  Iraj Saniee,et al.  Large-scale curvature of networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  O. Sporns Structure and function of complex brain networks , 2013, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[25]  Julien Cohen-Adad,et al.  The Human Connectome Project and beyond: Initial applications of 300mT/m gradients , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  Jose Maria Sigarreta,et al.  Gromov hyperbolic graphs , 2013, Discret. Math..

[27]  Alex R. Smith,et al.  Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Franco Bagnoli,et al.  Mapping cortical functions with a local community detection algorithm , 2014, J. Complex Networks.

[29]  D. Halpern,et al.  The new science of cognitive sex differences , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Bosiljka Tadic,et al.  Hierarchical sequencing of online social graphs , 2014, ArXiv.

[31]  Partha P. Mitra,et al.  The Circuit Architecture of Whole Brains at the Mesoscopic Scale , 2014, Neuron.

[32]  Bhaskar DasGupta,et al.  Topological implications of negative curvature for biological and social networks , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  M. Jorge Cardoso,et al.  Consensus between Pipelines in Structural Brain Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews a Meta-analysis of Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure , 2022 .

[35]  Javier M. Buldú,et al.  Functional brain networks: great expectations, hard times and the big leap forward , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Jose Maria Sigarreta,et al.  Distortion of the hyperbolicity constant in minor graphs , 2014, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[37]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  The modular and integrative functional architecture of the human brain , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Vince Grolmusz,et al.  Graph Theoretical Analysis Reveals: Women’s Brains Are Better Connected than Men’s , 2015, PloS one.

[39]  Vince Grolmusz,et al.  The Budapest Reference Connectome Server v2.0 , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  Bosiljka Tadić,et al.  Hidden geometry of traffic jamming. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  G. Tononi,et al.  Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Nitish Thakor,et al.  Progressive Gender Differences of Structural Brain Networks in Healthy Adults: A Longitudinal, Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study , 2015, PloS one.

[43]  Jose Maria Sigarreta,et al.  Small values of the hyperbolicity constant in graphs , 2016, Discret. Math..

[44]  M. Serrano,et al.  Hidden geometric correlations in real multiplex networks , 2016, Nature Physics.

[45]  Bosiljka Tadić,et al.  Algebraic Topology of Multi-Brain Connectivity Networks Reveals Dissimilarity in Functional Patterns during Spoken Communications , 2016, PloS one.

[46]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Functional complexity emerging from anatomical constraints in the brain: the significance of network modularity and rich-clubs , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[47]  Vince Grolmusz,et al.  Parameterizable consensus connectomes from the Human Connectome Project: the Budapest Reference Connectome Server v3.0 , 2016, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[48]  N. Jahanshad,et al.  Multimodal neuroimaging of male and female brain structure in health and disease across the life span , 2016, Journal of neuroscience research.

[49]  David Coudert,et al.  Applying clique-decomposition for computing Gromov hyperbolicity , 2017, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[50]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Emergent Hyperbolic Network Geometry , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[51]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  Coalescent embedding in the hyperbolic space unsupervisedly discloses the hidden geometry of the brain , 2017, 1705.04192.

[52]  Álvaro Martínez-Pérez,et al.  Generalized Chordality, Vertex Separators and Hyperbolicity on Graphs , 2017, Symmetry.

[53]  Hongkui Zeng,et al.  Mesoscale connectomics , 2018, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[54]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Simplicial complexes and complex systems , 2018, European Journal of Physics.

[55]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Functional connectivity predicts gender: Evidence for gender differences in resting brain connectivity , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[56]  Bosiljka Tadić,et al.  Origin of Hyperbolicity in Brain-to-Brain Coordination Networks , 2018, Front. Phys..

[57]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  Using diffusion MRI to discriminate areas of cortical grey matter , 2017, NeuroImage.

[58]  M. A. Muñoz Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems , 2017, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[59]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Mapping population-based structural connectomes , 2018, NeuroImage.

[60]  Lionel Rigoux,et al.  Cortical parcellation based on structural connectivity: A case for generative models , 2018, NeuroImage.

[61]  Bosiljka Tadic,et al.  Hidden geometries in networks arising from cooperative self-assembly , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[62]  Bosiljka Tadic,et al.  Self-organised criticality and emergent hyperbolic networks: blueprint for complexity in social dynamics , 2018, European Journal of Physics.

[63]  Andrei G. Vlassenko,et al.  Persistent metabolic youth in the aging female brain , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.