Vulnerability assessment of households and its possible reflection in flood risk management: The case of the upper Myjava basin, Slovakia

Abstract As a result of a change in the flood risk management paradigm from flood control to flood adaptation, the strategy of vulnerability reduction has become an inseparable part of flood risk management. A key aspect of vulnerability management is knowledge of the social system's vulnerability at the local level. The aim of this paper is to present an assessment of household vulnerability to flood hazards in the six villages of the upper Myjava basin (Slovakia), based on data obtained from a household survey, and to discuss the possibility of vulnerability reduction in the framework of flood risk management. Questionnaire issues are related to the exposure of each household to flood hazards, proxy variables affecting the susceptibility of household property to damage, susceptibility of households to physical and mental harm and the household ability to recover from flooding. Assessment of the household vulnerability in the municipalities through proxy variables is based on rules, justifiable criteria and indices representing individual aspects of vulnerability, as well as overall vulnerability. In relation to the vulnerability assessment, individual and institutional measures are specified for each community to reduce the vulnerability of households to flood hazards.

[1]  R. Pielke,et al.  Vulnerability and Risk: Some Thoughts from a Political and Policy Perspective , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria - paradigms of vulnerability revisited , 2009 .

[3]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany , 2009 .

[4]  Global Water Partnership.  Social aspects and stakeholder involvement in integrated flood management , 2006 .

[5]  D. Simpson,et al.  Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards , 2008 .

[6]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  Vulnerability of U.S. Cities to Environmental Hazards , 2007 .

[7]  Oliver Fritsch,et al.  Integrated and adaptive water resources management: exploring public participation in the UK , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[8]  R. Soetanto,et al.  The perceptions of social responsibility for community resilience to flooding: the impact of past experience, age, gender and ethnicity , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[9]  James D. Brown,et al.  Managing flood risk in the UK: towards an integration of social and technical perspectives , 2002 .

[10]  Ľ. Solín,et al.  Spatial variability in the flood vulnerability of urban areas in the headwater basins of Slovakia , 2012 .

[11]  T. L. Wilson,et al.  Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Risk modeling, assessment, and management , 1998 .

[13]  Anna Scolobig,et al.  Contextualizing social vulnerability: findings from case studies across Europe , 2011 .

[14]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  H. Boon.  Disaster resilience in a flood-impacted rural Australian town , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[16]  B. Wisner,et al.  At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters , 1996 .

[17]  Dong Keun Yoon,et al.  Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: a comparative study , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[18]  B H Morrow,et al.  Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. , 1999, Disasters.

[19]  Eric Tate,et al.  Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[20]  E. Penning‐Rowsell,et al.  Estimating Injury and Loss of Life in Floods: A Deterministic Framework , 2005 .

[21]  M. Browne,et al.  The Demand for Flood Insurance: Empirical Evidence , 1999 .

[22]  A. Werritty,et al.  Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm? , 2006 .

[23]  Daniela Molinari,et al.  Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[24]  Erich J. Plate,et al.  Flood risk and flood management , 2002 .

[25]  Ľ. Solín,et al.  Flood hazards in the headwaters area: lessons learned from a survey of households in the upper Myjava basin, Slovakia , 2017 .

[26]  K. Nagel,et al.  Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions , 2006 .

[27]  Yacov Y Haimes.  Systems-based guiding principles for risk modeling, planning, assessment, management, and communication. , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Colin Green,et al.  The evaluation of vulnerability to flooding , 2004 .

[29]  W. L. Shirley,et al.  Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards , 2003 .

[30]  Kuei-Hsien Liao,et al.  From flood control to flood adaptation: a case study on the Lower Green River Valley and the City of Kent in King County, Washington , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[31]  Terje Aven,et al.  Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.