Adaptive intervention in Probabilistic Boolean Networks

Probabilistic Boolean Networks (PBNs) have been recently introduced as a paradigm for modeling genetic regulatory networks. One of the objectives of PBN modeling is to use the network for the design and analysis of intervention strategies aimed at moving the network out of undesirable states, such as those associated with disease, and into desirable ones. To date, a number of intervention strategies have been proposed in the context of PBNs. However, most of these techniques assume perfect knowledge of the transition probability matrix of the PBN. Such an assumption cannot be satisfied in practice, and may lead to degraded, if not completely unacceptable, performance. To remedy the situation, one can adopt one of two main approaches:(i) design an intervention strategy that is “robust” or somewhat insensitive to the presence of a class of modeling errors, such as uncertainties in the transition probability matrix; or (ii) introduce on-line adaptation or learning into the intervention strategy to ensure satisfactory performance provided the modeling error belongs to a particular class. The first approach has already been developed in an earlier paper. The main goal of this paper is to demonstrate the feasibility of the second approach. Using simulation studies, it is shown that adaptive intervention works well in two different scenarios: first, when we have a family of PBNs whose individual transition probability matrices are reasonably well modeled and the predominant uncertainty is about which member of that family represents the underlying genetic regulatory network; and second, when we have a context sensitive PBN with a low probability of a context change so that there is sufficient time between context changes for the adaptive algorithm to learn the context and exploit it in the intervention design. These results agree quite well with intuitive expectations.

[1]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  A Bayesian connectivity-based approach to constructing probabilistic gene regulatory networks , 2004, Bioinform..

[2]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Intervention in context-sensitive probabilistic Boolean networks , 2005, Bioinform..

[3]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Introduction to Genomic Signal Processing with Control , 2006 .

[4]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Generating Boolean networks with a prescribed attractor structure , 2005, Bioinform..

[5]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Stochastic Systems: Estimation, Identification, and Adaptive Control , 1986 .

[6]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  External Control in Markovian Genetic Regulatory Networks , 2004, Machine Learning.

[7]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Optimal Intervention in Asynchronous Genetic Regulatory Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[8]  P. Kumar,et al.  Optimal adaptive controllers for unknown Markov chains , 1982 .

[9]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Robust adaptive control: a unified approach , 1991 .

[10]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Robust Intervention in Probabilistic Boolean Networks , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[11]  E. Dougherty,et al.  On the long-run sensitivity of probabilistic Boolean networks. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Dynamical analysis of a generic Boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle , 2006, ISMB.

[13]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[14]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Steady-state probabilities for attractors in probabilistic Boolean networks , 2005, Signal Process..

[15]  A. Datta,et al.  External Control in Markovian Genetic Regulatory Networks , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[16]  M. Bittner,et al.  Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[17]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Optimal infinite horizon control for probabilistic Boolean networks , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[18]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Design of probabilistic Boolean networks under the requirement of contextual data consistency , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks , 2002, Bioinform..

[20]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  From Boolean to probabilistic Boolean networks as models of genetic regulatory networks , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[21]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Intervention in Context-Sensitive Probabilistic Boolean Networks Revisited , 2009, EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol..

[22]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER Systems biology Intervention in a family of Boolean networks , 2022 .

[23]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[24]  Xinglai Ji,et al.  libSRES: a C library for stochastic ranking evolution strategy for parameter estimation , 2006, Bioinform..