A Benchmarking Analysis of Spanish Commercial Airports. A Comparison Between SMOP and DEA Ranking Methods

In this paper we use the flexibility of Surface Measure of Overall Performance (SMOP) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) ranking methods to analyze the relative performance of each individual Spanish airport, and to fully rank both efficient, as well as inefficient airports. Most airports have previously compared their efficiency according to the results of some partial productivity ratios. However, this approach does not provide a good understanding of the overall performance of the airports. For this reason, we use six different ranking approaches in order to fully rank the performance of Spanish airports. The first and second approaches are based on the SMOP obtained by nine complementary partial performance indicators. The third approach involves the evaluation of a cross-efficiency matrix, in which airports are evaluated according to its weights and their rivals' weights. The fourth and fifth approaches rank the airports' performance through the exclusion of the airport being analyzed, and are known as super-efficiency models in the DEA parlance. And finally the sixth approach is based on the analysis of the virtual airport and the comparison of the rest of the airports with this “champion performer”. Finally, in this paper, we try to fill the gap between the performance based on the partial productivity indicators and the proposed ranking methods. To this purpose, we calculate non-parametric statistical tests to verify the consistency between the ranking obtained from each method.

[1]  Anne Graham,et al.  AIRPORT MANAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS , 1987 .

[2]  Joseph Sarkis An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States , 2000 .

[3]  Elizabeth E. Bailey,et al.  Public Regulation: New Perspectives on Institutions and Policies , 1987 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF EFFICIENCY CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE ADDITIVE MODEL OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[5]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. Pacheco,et al.  Managerial efficiency of Brazilian airports , 2003 .

[8]  M. Abbott,et al.  Total Factor Productivity and Efficiency of Australian Airports , 2002 .

[9]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[10]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA non-parametric ranking test and index measurement: slack-adjusted DEA and an application to Japanese agriculture cooperatives , 1999 .

[11]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[12]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Flying into the Future: Air Transport Policy in the European Union , 1998 .

[13]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[14]  T. Oum,et al.  A comparative analysis of productivity performance of the world's major airports: summary report of the ATRS global airport benchmarking research report—2002 , 2003 .

[15]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[16]  Graham Francis,et al.  International Survey of Performance Measurement in Airports , 2002 .

[17]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[18]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  A DEA Bibliography (1978–1992) , 1994 .

[20]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Relative efficiency of European airports , 1999 .

[21]  At-H Chin,et al.  AIRPORT PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN CHANGI AIRPORT AND AIRPORTS IN THE NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY METROLPOLITAN AREA , 2001 .

[22]  Cynthia M. Costas-Centivany Spain's airport infrastructure: adaptations to liberalization and privatization , 1999 .

[23]  P. W. Wilson Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs , 1993 .

[24]  Juan Carlos Martín,et al.  An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization , 2001 .

[25]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[26]  Clifford Winston,et al.  The Evolution of the Airline Industry , 1994 .

[27]  D. Stasinopoulos,et al.  Developments in transport policy: the aviation policy of the European Community. , 1990 .

[28]  D Parker,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE OF BAA BEFORE AND AFTER PRIVATIZATION , 1999 .

[29]  D. Stasinopoulos The second aviation package of the European Community. , 1992 .

[30]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[31]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[32]  Graham Francis,et al.  The benchmarking of airport performance , 2002 .

[33]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[34]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  Airline Deregulation: The Cost Pieces of the Puzzle , 1995 .

[35]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[37]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[38]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information , 2000 .

[39]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Inefficiencies and scale economies of European airport operations , 2003 .

[40]  B. Vasigh,et al.  SIZE VERSUS EFFICIENCY: A CASE STUDY OF US COMMERCIAL AIRPORTS , 2003 .

[41]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The measurement of productive efficiency : techniques and applications , 1993 .

[42]  Joe Zhu Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[43]  D Vincent,et al.  THE AVIATION POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY , 1990 .

[44]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Measuring airport quality from the airlines' viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[45]  Graham Francis,et al.  PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: A REVIEW OF AIRPORTS , 2002 .

[46]  D. Stasinopoulos,et al.  THE THIRD PHASE OF LIBERALISATION IN COMMUNITY AVIATION AND THE NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTARY MEASURES. , 1993 .

[47]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[49]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Incentives and productivity measurements , 1995 .

[50]  David Gillen,et al.  DEVELOPING MEASURES OF AIRPORT PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[51]  A. Graham,et al.  The Economic Performance of European Airports , 1995 .