Numerical simulation of passive heat removal under severe core meltdown scenario in a sodium cooled fast reactor

A sequence of highly unlikely events leading to significant meltdown of the Sodium cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) core can cause the failure of reactor vessel if the molten fuel debris settles at the bottom of the reactor main vessel. To prevent this, pool type SFRs are usually provided with an in-vessel core catcher above the bottom wall of the main vessel. The core catcher should collect, retain and passively cool these debris by facilitating decay heat removal by natural convection. In the present work, the heat removal capability of the existing single tray core catcher design has been evaluated numerically by analyzing the transient development of natural convection loops inside SFR pool. A 1-D heat diffusion model and a simplified 2-D axi-symmetric CFD model are developed for the same. Maximum temperature of the core catcher plate evaluated for different core meltdown scenarios using these models showed that there is much higher heat removal potential for single tray in-vessel SFR core catcher compared to the design basis case of melting of 7 subassemblies under total instantaneous blockage of a subassembly. The study also revealed that the side pool of cold sodium plays a significant role in decay heat removal. The maximum debris bed temperature attained during the initial hours of PAHR does not depend much on when the Decay Heat Exchanger (DHX) gets operational, and it substantiates the inherent safety of the system. The present study paves the way for better understanding of the thermal hydraulics of Post Accident Heat Removal (PAHR) towards extending the functionality of core catcher for handling Whole Core Meltdown Accident (WCA) scenarios in future SFRs.

[1]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  PATH – An experimental facility for natural circulation heat transfer studies related to Post Accident Thermal Hydraulics , 2011 .

[2]  Raymond Viskanta,et al.  Transient natural convection of low‐Prandtl‐number fluids in a differentially heated cavity , 1991 .

[3]  Abdulmajeed A. Mohamad,et al.  Modeling of turbulent buoyant flow and heat transfer in liquid metals , 1993 .

[4]  Chie Gau,et al.  Three-dimensional natural convection heat transfer of a liquid metal in a cavity , 1986 .

[5]  Daniel Magallon,et al.  Pouring of 100-kg-Scale Molten UO2 into Sodium , 1992 .

[6]  A. Sharma,et al.  Turbulent natural convection of sodium in a cylindrical enclosure with multiple internal heat sources: A conjugate heat transfer study , 2009 .

[7]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  Primary containment capacity of Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor against core disruptive accident loadings , 2013 .

[8]  Jean-Marie Seiler,et al.  A multi-crucible core-catcher concept: Design considerations and basic results , 1995 .

[9]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  A multi layer core catcher concept for future sodium cooled fast reactors , 2014 .

[10]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[11]  G. Karsten,et al.  Effects of Different Types of Void Volumes on the Radial Temperature Distribution of Fuel Pins , 1970 .

[12]  Norihiro Kikuchi,et al.  Computation of natural convection test at Phenix reactor using the NETFLOW++ code , 2013 .

[13]  K. Velusamy,et al.  Evaluation of post accident molten material relocation time to the core catcher in a fast breeder reactor , 2014 .

[14]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  Decay heat removal in pool type fast reactor using passive systems , 2012 .

[15]  Namduk Suh,et al.  An evolution of molten core cooling strategies , 2009 .

[16]  C. J. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Natural-convection flow in a square cavity calculated with low-Reynolds-number turbulence models , 1991 .

[17]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  The design of the prototype Fast Breeder Reactor , 2006 .