Transfer Function of a Biological Photoreceptor

A full description of the function of a sensory organ, or sensory element, should include definition of the limits of signal transfer. This can be done if the stimulating energy is monitored and, at the same time, the nervous impulses emanating from the sensory receptor are detected and studied. It is believed that the signal that represents the input stimulus, and is transmitted to other centers of the central nervous system, is the average frequency of these nerve impulses. By correlating the instantaneous values of the stimulus and the nerve impulse signal, it is possible to make a rigorous statement regarding the transfer characteristics of the sensory receptor. The task, then, is to find the equation (generally an integro-differential equation) that characterizes the functional relationship between input and output (1-4). To explore the problem, we have chosen to study the photosensitive tail ganglion of Cambarus Astacus, the common crayfish (5-8). Behavioral and reflex studies have demonstrated a physiological role for the receptor (9, 10). Figure XV-1 shows the neuroanatomical structure as drawn by Retzius. The terminal abdominal ganglion, a translucent neuropil of 2-mm diameter receives fibers of several sensory modes from the uropods (7, 8). A small number of neurones, approximately 10, transduces photic energy. Lack of apparent spatial orginization in its structure, absence of lens, and sluggishness of behavioral response suggest that the ganglion serves to detect levels of background illumination only. Through a window in the ventral abdominal exoskeleton, gross electrodes were applied to the ventral nerve cord. The animal was kept in a humidity and temperaturecontrolled environment (100 per cent saturation, 190 ± 0. 5 C). An electronically controlled light source was used to generate transient steps, as well as sinusoidal variations of light (11). Relatively small light fluctuations in a darkened environment permitted small-signal linearization.

[1]  G. Westheimer Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus. , 1954, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  LAWRENCE STARK,et al.  Pupil Unrest: An Example of Noise in a Biological Servomechanism , 1958, Nature.

[3]  E. Ludvigh,et al.  Study of visual acuity during the ocular pursuit of moving test objects. I. Introduction. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  P. M. Sherman,et al.  A servoanalytic study of consensual pupil reflex to light. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. B. Bender,et al.  Neural limitations of visual excitability: alterations produced by cerebral lesions. , 1960, Archives of neurology.

[6]  C. Ladd Prosser ACTION POTENTIALS IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM OF THE CRAYFISH , 1935, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  J. D. Boyd Die Rolle der einzelnen Labyrinthrezeptoren bei der Orientation von Augen und Kopf im Raume. , 1952 .

[8]  Gerald Westheimer A note on the response characteristics of the extraocular muscle system , 1958 .

[9]  J. Pringle,et al.  The Response Of A Sense Organ To A Harmonic Stimulus , 1952 .

[10]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Stability, Oscillations, and Noise in the Human Pupil Servomechanism , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[11]  William M. Smith,et al.  Eye Movement and Stimulus Movement; New Photoelectric Electromechanical System for Recording and Measuring Tracking Motions of the Eye* , 1960 .

[12]  E MARG,et al.  Development of electro-oculography; standing potential of the eye in registration of eye movement. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  W. D. Wright,et al.  Eye Movements During Monocular Fixation , 1948, Nature.

[14]  A. Mcintyre The quick component of nystagmus , 1939, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Photographic records of convergence and divergence. , 1907 .

[16]  H. Barlow Eye movements during fixation , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE AND DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF THE ELECTRIC RESPONSE TO ILLUMINATION OF THE ARTHROPOD EYE , 1928 .

[18]  C. Wiersma,et al.  The central representation of sensory stimulation in the crayfish. , 1955, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[19]  F. Grieder,et al.  Neue Kontaktplatten-Methode zum Studium der zeit- und konzentrationsabhängigen morphologischen Effekte an Bakterien , 1957 .

[20]  L. Riggs,et al.  Involuntary motions of the eye during monocular fixation. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  R. W. Ditchburn,et al.  Involuntary eye movements during fixation , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  L Stark,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of the Motor Coordination System in Man. , 1961, Biophysical journal.

[23]  R. L. Nó Observations on Nystagmus , 1934 .

[24]  D. Kennedy Responses from the crayfish caudal photoreceptor. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  P. Pasik,et al.  Effects of cerebral lesions upon opto-kinetic nystagmus in monkeys. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  K. S. Lion,et al.  Study of ocular movements under stress. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  J. Eccles,et al.  The isometric responses of mammalian muscles , 1930, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Yoshinori Kawagoe,et al.  Neurology of the Ocular Muscles , 1948 .

[29]  F. H. Adler,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FIXATION ON THE VISUAL ACUITY , 1934 .

[30]  B. Shackel Note on mobile eye viewpoint recording. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  G. Westheimer Mechanism of saccadic eye movements. , 1954, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  D. Hebb,et al.  Visual perception approached by the method of stabilized images. , 1960, Canadian journal of psychology.

[33]  N H MACKWORTH,et al.  Eye fixations recorded on changing visual scenes by the television eye-marker. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[34]  J. Welsh,et al.  The caudal photoreceptor and responses of the crayfish to light , 1934 .

[35]  J. Hyde,et al.  Extraocular proprioception in electrically induced eye movements. , 1960, The American journal of physiology.

[36]  E. Poulton,et al.  On reading and visual fatigue. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  L. Riggs,et al.  Visual acuity and the normal tremor of the eyes. , 1951, Science.

[38]  C. Rashbass New method for recording eye movements. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[39]  C. Rashbass,et al.  Barbiturate Nystagmus and the Mechanisms of Visual Fixation , 1959, Nature.

[40]  B. Kropp,et al.  PHOTIC STIMULATION AND LEG MOVEMENTS IN THE CRAYFISH , 1933, The Journal of general physiology.