Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.

AIM To investigate the relationship between the functional properties and the phase transformation of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. METHODOLOGY Five types of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments with a 0.30 mm diameter tip (EndoWave, HERO 642, K3, ProFile.06, and ProTaper) were selected to investigate torsional and bending properties, and phase transformation behaviour. A torsional test was performed according to ISO publication 3630-1, and maximum torque and angular deflection at fracture were measured. Bending load of the instruments was measured in a cantilever-bending test at 37 degrees C with the maximum deflection of 4.0 mm. A stainless steel K-file was used for reference. Phase transformation behaviour was measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). From the DSC curve, transformation temperatures were calculated. Data were analysed by anova and the Tukey-Kramer's test. RESULTS The maximum torsional torque values of HERO, K3 and ProTaper were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those of EndoWave, ProFile and K-file. The K-files had the lowest torque value. Angular deflection at fracture was significantly higher (P < 0.05) for K-files than that for any nickel-titanium instrument. The bending load values of HERO and K3 were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those of EndoWave, ProFile, ProTaper and K-file. The K-files had the lowest load value, although residual deflection remained. The transformation temperatures of HERO and K3 were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those of EndoWave, ProFile and ProTaper. CONCLUSIONS The functional properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments, especially their flexible bending load level, were closely related to the transformation behaviour of the alloys.

[1]  G. Kuhn,et al.  Fatigue and mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  S. A. Thompson An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[3]  J. Powers,et al.  Differential scanning calorimetric studies of nickel titanium rotary endodontic instruments. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  N. Richards,et al.  Torsional properties of stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files after multiple autoclave sterilizations. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  G. Kuhn,et al.  Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  P. Esposito,et al.  A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  J Camps,et al.  Torsional and stiffness properties of Canal Master U stainless steel and nitinol instruments. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  D. Clement,et al.  Torsional testing of the Lightspeed nickel-titanium instrument system. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  E Schäfer,et al.  Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[10]  J. Powers,et al.  Differential scanning calorimetric studies of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments after simulated clinical use. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  H. Gerstein,et al.  Use of a hemostatic agent in the repair of procedural errors. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  G K Kulkarni,et al.  An in vitro study of the torsional properties of new and used K3 instruments. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[13]  S A Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[14]  H. Gerstein,et al.  An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  L. Castleman,et al.  Biocompatibility of nitinol alloy as an implant material. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  J. P. Pruett,et al.  Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  S. A. Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[18]  O. Peters,et al.  Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  H. Doi,et al.  Bending properties and transformation temperatures of heat treated Ni-Ti alloy wire for orthodontic appliances. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  H. Doi,et al.  Super-elasticity and thermal behavior of Ni-Ti alloy orthodontic arch wires. , 1992, Dental materials journal.

[21]  K. Speck,et al.  Anodic Polarization Behavior of Ti-Ni and Ti-6A 1-4 V in Simulated Physiological Solutions , 1980, Journal of dental research.

[22]  F. Chagneau,et al.  Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  Gholamreza Danesh,et al.  Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[24]  W J Pertot,et al.  Relationship between file size and stiffness of nickel titanium instruments. , 1995, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[25]  W. Brantley,et al.  Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses of superelastic and nonsuperelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wires. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  E Mandel,et al.  Rotary Ni-Ti profile systems for preparing curved canals in resin blocks: influence of operator on instrument breakage. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[27]  K. Al-Fouzan Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and the potential for bypassing in vivo. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[28]  G. Chiandussi,et al.  Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[29]  P. Dummer,et al.  Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[30]  W J Pertot,et al.  Torsional and stiffness properties of nickel-titanium K files. , 1995, International endodontic journal.

[31]  E Schäfer,et al.  Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[32]  H H Messer,et al.  Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.