Molecular Mechanical Differences between Isoforms of Contractile Actin in the Presence of Isoforms of Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin

The proteins involved in smooth muscle's molecular contractile mechanism – the anti-parallel motion of actin and myosin filaments driven by myosin heads interacting with actin – are found as different isoforms. While their expression levels are altered in disease states, their relevance to the mechanical interaction of myosin with actin is not sufficiently understood. Here, we analyzed in vitro actin filament propulsion by smooth muscle myosin for -actin (A), -actin-tropomyosin- (A-Tm), -actin-tropomyosin- (A-Tm), -actin (A), -actin-tropomyosin- (A-Tm), and -actin-tropomoysin- (A-Tm). Actin sliding analysis with our specifically developed video analysis software followed by statistical assessment (Bootstrapped Principal Component Analysis) indicated that the in vitro motility of A, A, and A-Tm is not distinguishable. Compared to these three ‘baseline conditions’, statistically significant differences () were: A-Tm – actin sliding velocity increased 1.12-fold, A-Tm – motile fraction decreased to 0.96-fold, stop time elevated 1.6-fold, A-Tm – run time elevated 1.7-fold. We constructed a mathematical model, simulated actin sliding data, and adjusted the kinetic parameters so as to mimic the experimentally observed differences: A-Tm – myosin binding to actin, the main, and the secondary myosin power stroke are accelerated, A-Tm – mechanical coupling between myosins is stronger, A-Tm – the secondary power stroke is decelerated and mechanical coupling between myosins is weaker. In summary, our results explain the different regulatory effects that specific combinations of actin and smooth muscle tropomyosin have on smooth muscle actin-myosin interaction kinetics.

[1]  R. A. Murphy,et al.  Actin and tropomyosin variants in smooth muscles. Dependence on tissue type. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  T. Eddinger,et al.  Myosin II isoforms in smooth muscle: heterogeneity and function. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[3]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Computer-assisted tracking of actin filament motility. , 1992, Analytical biochemistry.

[4]  W. Steffen,et al.  Mapping the actin filament with myosin , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Coulton,et al.  Role of the head-to-tail overlap region in smooth and skeletal muscle beta-tropomyosin. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[6]  P. Graceffa,et al.  Effect of Caldesmon on the Position and Myosin-induced Movement of Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin Bound to Actin* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  J. Zegers,et al.  Path reconstruction as a tool for actin filament speed determination in the in vitro motility assay. , 1999, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  P. Graceffa Movement of smooth muscle tropomyosin by myosin heads. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[9]  Qianqian Peng,et al.  PCA-based bootstrap confidence interval tests for gene-disease association involving multiple SNPs , 2010, BMC Genetics.

[10]  K. Morgan,et al.  Invited review: cross-bridge regulation by thin filament-associated proteins. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  Nedjma B. Zitouni,et al.  The kinetics of mechanically coupled myosins exhibit group size-dependent regimes. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[12]  A. Månsson,et al.  Multivariate statistics in analysis of data from the in vitro motility assay. , 2003, Analytical biochemistry.

[13]  A. Sobieszek Steady-state kinetic studies on the actin activation of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin subfragments. Effects of skeletal, smooth and non-muscle tropomyosins. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  D. Hartshorne,et al.  Interaction of smooth muscle tropomyosin and smooth muscle myosin. Effect on the properties of myosin. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[15]  Iain D. C. Fraser,et al.  A simple method for automatic tracking of actin filaments in the motility assay , 1996, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[16]  E. Morris,et al.  Comparison of the effects of smooth and skeletal tropomyosin on skeletal actomyosin subfragment 1 ATPase. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  Joseph J. Harrington,et al.  Effective dimensionality of environmental indicators: a principal component analysis with bootstrap confidence intervals , 1998 .

[18]  J. Sellers,et al.  Characterization of in vitro motility assays using smooth muscle and cytoplasmic myosins. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  Nedjma B. Zitouni,et al.  (+)Insert smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-B) isoform expression in human tissues. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[20]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[21]  Nedjma B. Zitouni,et al.  Myosin, transgelin, and myosin light chain kinase: expression and function in asthma. , 2009, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[22]  J. Spudich,et al.  Myosin step size. Estimation from slow sliding movement of actin over low densities of heavy meromyosin. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  E. Homsher,et al.  Factors affecting movement of F-actin filaments propelled by skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  V Lombardi,et al.  Two independent mechanical events in the interaction cycle of skeletal muscle myosin with actin. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Smooth muscle myosin isoform expression and LC20 phosphorylation in innate rat airway hyperresponsiveness. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[26]  A. Coulton,et al.  Functional homodimers and heterodimers of recombinant smooth muscle tropomyosin. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[27]  M. Konrad,et al.  Regulatory properties of tropomyosin effects of length, isoform, and N-terminal sequence. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[28]  K. Kohama,et al.  In vitro movement of actin filaments on gizzard smooth muscle myosin: requirement of phosphorylation of myosin light chain and effects of tropomyosin and caldesmon. , 1991, Journal of biochemistry.

[29]  J. D. Pardee,et al.  [18] Purification of muscle actin , 1982 .

[30]  S. Fisher Vascular smooth muscle phenotypic diversity and function. , 2010, Physiological genomics.

[31]  Steven B Marston,et al.  A simple method for measuring the relative force exerted by myosin on actin filaments in the in vitro motility assay: evidence that tropomyosin and troponin increase force in single thin filaments. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[32]  K. Trybus,et al.  Smooth muscle myosin cross-bridge interactions modulate actin filament sliding velocity in vitro , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Smooth and skeletal muscle actin are mechanically indistinguishable in the in vitro motility assay. , 1993, Circulation research.

[34]  Steven B Marston Random walks with thin filaments: application of in vitro motility assay to the study of actomyosin regulation , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[35]  D. Root,et al.  Calmodulin-sensitive interaction of human nebulin fragments with actin and myosin. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[36]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  Rate of force generation in muscle: correlation with actomyosin ATPase activity in solution. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Bárány,et al.  Biochemistry of smooth muscle contraction , 1996 .

[38]  J. Spudich,et al.  Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Y. Goldman,et al.  Initiation of active contraction by photogeneration of adenosine‐5'‐triphosphate in rabbit psoas muscle fibres. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  James A. Spudich,et al.  Chapter 18 Purification of Muscle Actin , 1982 .

[41]  J. Spudich,et al.  Purification of muscle actin. , 1982, Methods in enzymology.

[42]  A. Sobieszek Smooth Muscle Myosin: Molecule Conformation, Filament Assembly and Associated Regulatory Enzymes , 1994 .

[43]  Age K Smilde,et al.  Estimating confidence intervals for principal component loadings: a comparison between the bootstrap and asymptotic results. , 2007, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[44]  R. Goyal,et al.  Differences in contractile protein content and isoforms in phasic and tonic smooth muscles. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[45]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  Comparison of effects of smooth and skeletal muscle tropomyosins on interactions of actin and myosin subfragment 1. , 1984, Biochemistry.

[46]  Justin E. Molloy,et al.  Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  P. Graceffa Phosphorylation of Smooth Muscle Myosin Heads Regulates the Head-induced Movement of Tropomyosin* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Richard Stafford,et al.  Use of confidence radii to visualise significant differences in principal components analysis: Application to mammal assemblages at locations with different disturbance levels , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[49]  R. Léguillette,et al.  (+)Insert smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-B): from single molecule to human. , 2006, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[50]  Steven B Marston,et al.  Role of tropomyosin in the regulation of contraction in smooth muscle. , 2008, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[51]  T. Hirabayashi,et al.  Tropomyosin isoforms in developing chicken gizzard smooth muscle. , 1989, Journal of biochemistry.

[52]  P. Graceffa,et al.  Myosin-Induced Movement of αα, αβ, and ββ Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin on Actin Observed by Multisite FRET , 2004 .

[53]  David Zwicker,et al.  Tracking single particles and elongated filaments with nanometer precision. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[54]  I. Herman Actin isoforms. , 1993, Current opinion in cell biology.

[55]  L. Smillie Chapter 5 – Tropomyosin , 1996 .

[56]  Nedjma B. Zitouni,et al.  Affinity for MgADP and force of unbinding from actin of myosin purified from tonic and phasic smooth muscle. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[57]  R. Dominguez,et al.  Structural Analysis of Smooth Muscle Tropomyosin α and β Isoforms* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.