Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

[1]  A. Miller,et al.  Physical examination. Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian national breast screening study , 1990, Cancer.

[2]  D Morrell,et al.  Incidence of cancer in 161 families affected by ataxia-telangiectasia. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  B. Trock,et al.  Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. , 1991, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[4]  F. Shtern.  Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. , 1992, Radiology.

[5]  J. Na,et al.  Calculated risk of breast cancer following mantle irradiation determined by measured dose. , 1992 .

[6]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  R. Parshad,et al.  Familial clustering of breast cancer: Possible interaction between dna repair proficiency and radiation exposure in the development of breast cancer , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[8]  E. Thomson,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 1997 .

[9]  K Offit,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. , 1997, JAMA.

[10]  E. Thomson,et al.  Recommendations for Follow-up Care of Individuals With an Inherited Predisposition to Cancer: I. Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer , 1997 .

[11]  M. Anbar,et al.  Clinical thermal imaging today , 1998, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[12]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  F. Houn,et al.  Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada. , 1999, Radiology.

[14]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  T. To,et al.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast Cancer Mortality after 11 to 16 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Screening Trial of Mammography in Women Age 40 to 49 Years , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  M. Fernö,et al.  Relation between the rate of tumour cell proliferation and latency time in radiation associated breast cancer , 2003, BMC Cancer.

[20]  Theo van der Kwast,et al.  A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false‐negative mammography , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[21]  C. Baines.  Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. , 2003, JAMA.

[24]  J. Hopper,et al.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[25]  A. Berg.  Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Counterpoint). , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  Alexandra L Hanlon,et al.  Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older , 2003, Cancer.

[27]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  R. Carlson.  NCCN breast cancer clinical practice guidelines in oncology: an update. , 2003, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[29]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[31]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  P. Skaane,et al.  Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[34]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.

[35]  P. Carney,et al.  Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[37]  J. Austoker,et al.  The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[38]  Constantine A Gatsonis,et al.  American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. , 2005, Radiology.

[39]  J. Leung.  Screening mammography reduces morbidity of breast cancer treatment. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer growth rates and its impact on screening policy. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[42]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation analysis in the Indonesian population , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[43]  J. Chang-Claude,et al.  Effect of chest X-rays on the risk of breast cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the international BRCA1/2 carrier cohort study: a report from the EMBRACE, GENEPSO, GEO-HEBON, and IBCCS Collaborators' Group. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  K. Offit,et al.  Effect of Mammography on Breast Cancer Risk in Women with Mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[45]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[46]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[47]  Bruce L Daniel,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, JAMA.

[48]  P. Møller,et al.  Screening mammography and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a case-control study. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[49]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  P. Skaane,et al.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. , 2007, Radiology.

[51]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. , 2007, Radiology.

[52]  Laura Cortesi,et al.  Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. , 2007, Radiology.

[53]  Noel T Brewer,et al.  Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[54]  David Gur,et al.  Tomosynthesis: potential clinical role in breast imaging. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[55]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[56]  T. Sellers,et al.  Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[57]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[58]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. , 2007, Radiology.

[60]  S. Duffy,et al.  Complexities in the estimation of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[61]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Estimation of lead time and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[62]  A Russell Localio,et al.  Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[63]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[64]  P. Skaane.  Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[65]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[66]  Marvin Zelen,et al.  Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms , 2009 .

[67]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[68]  M. Schnall,et al.  Prospective study of breast MRI in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: effect of mutation status on cancer incidence , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[69]  Carmen L. Lewis,et al.  Decision-Making Processes for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screening: The DECISIONS Survey , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[70]  Sue M Moss,et al.  False-Positive Results in the Randomized Controlled Trial of Mammographic Screening from Age 40 (“Age” Trial) , 2010, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[71]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[72]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[73]  H. Welch,et al.  Overdiagnosis in cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[74]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[75]  Jonathan H Sunshine,et al.  How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography? , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[76]  G. Gazelle,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers. , 2010, Radiology.

[77]  L. Tabár,et al.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. , 2011, Radiology.

[78]  M. Torloni,et al.  Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[79]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Recall or Biopsy Recommendation After 10 Years of Screening Mammography , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[80]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[81]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening. , 2011, Preventive medicine.

[82]  Laura Cortesi,et al.  Multicenter Surveillance of Women at High Genetic Breast Cancer Risk Using Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (the High Breast Cancer Risk Italian 1 Study): Final Results , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[83]  Lawrence W. Bassett,et al.  Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. , 2012, Radiology.

[84]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[85]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. , 2012, JAMA.

[86]  Janet E. Hiller,et al.  A systematic review of elastography, electrical impedance scanning, and digital infrared thermography for breast cancer screening and diagnosis , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[87]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis and the challenges of implementing an emerging breast cancer screening technology into clinical practice. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[88]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Short-Term Outcomes of Screening Mammography Using Computer-Aided Detection , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[89]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates? , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[90]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[91]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[92]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[93]  E. Halpern,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers , 2013, Cancer.

[94]  J. Elmore,et al.  The Cost of Breast Cancer Screening in the United States: A Picture Is Worth ... a Billion Dollars? , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[95]  L. Esserman,et al.  Aggregate Cost of Mammography Screening in the United States: Comparison of Current Practice and Advocated Guidelines , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[96]  H. Welch,et al.  Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[97]  Nancy L Keating,et al.  A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. , 2014, JAMA.

[98]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Cancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectancies. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[99]  T. To,et al.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[100]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. , 2014, JAMA.