Extracting Useful Information from Basic Safety Message Data: An Empirical Study of Driving Volatility Measures and Crash Frequency at Intersections

With the emergence of high-frequency connected and automated vehicle data, analysts can extract useful information from them. To this end, the concept of “driving volatility” is defined and explored as deviation from the norm. Several measures of dispersion and variation can be computed in different ways using vehicles’ instantaneous speed, acceleration, and jerk observed at intersections. This study explores different measures of volatility, representing newly available surrogate measures of safety, by combining data from the Michigan Safety Pilot Deployment of connected vehicles with crash and inventory data at several intersections. For each intersection, 37 different measures of volatility were calculated. These volatilities were then used to explain crash frequencies at intersection by estimating fixed and random parameter Poisson regression models. Given that volatility reflects the degree to which vehicles move, erratic movements are expected to increase crash risk. Results show that an increase in three measures of driving volatility are positively associated with higher intersection crash frequency, controlling for exposure variables and geometric features. More intersection crashes were associated with higher percentages of vehicle data points (speed & acceleration) lying beyond threshold-bands. These bands were created using mean plus two standard deviations. Furthermore, a higher magnitude of time-varying stochastic volatility of vehicle speeds when they pass through the intersection is associated with higher crash frequencies. These measures can be used to locate intersections with high driving volatilities. A deeper analysis of these intersections can be undertaken, and proactive safety countermeasures considered to enhance safety.

[1]  Amir Ghiasi,et al.  A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method , 2017 .

[2]  Behram Wali,et al.  An ordered-probit analysis of enforcement of road speed limits , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport.

[3]  Abdolreza Sheikholeslami,et al.  Safety Effect of U-Turn Conversions in Tehran: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-and-After Study and Crash Prediction Models , 2013 .

[4]  Alan E Stewart,et al.  Motor Vehicle Crash versus Accident: A Change in Terminology Is Necessary , 2002, Journal of traumatic stress.

[5]  Mohamed Ahmed,et al.  Exploring the Impacts of Adverse Weather Conditions on Speed and Headway Behaviors Using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2017 .

[6]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Role of Multiagency Response and On-Scene Times in Large-Scale Traffic Incidents , 2017 .

[7]  Behram Wali,et al.  Contributory fault and level of personal injury to drivers involved in head-on collisions: Application of copula-based bivariate ordinal models. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Can Data Generated by Connected Vehicles Enhance Safety?: Proactive Approach to Intersection Safety Management , 2017 .

[9]  James L Brown,et al.  Human Factors Literature Reviews on Intersections, Speed Management, Pedestrians and Bicyclists, and Visibility , 2006 .

[10]  Behram Wali,et al.  Analysis of volatility in driving regimes extracted from basic safety messages transmitted between connected vehicles , 2017, 1808.07014.

[11]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2004, Technometrics.

[12]  K. Train Halton Sequences for Mixed Logit , 2000 .

[13]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[14]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Development of a method for detecting jerks in safety critical events. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  A Synthesis of Spatial Models for Multivariate Count Responses , 2017 .

[16]  Mohamed Ahmed,et al.  Drivers’ Lane-Keeping Ability in Heavy Rain: Preliminary Investigation Using SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2017 .

[17]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Safety Impacts of Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic , 2018 .

[18]  J. G. Kretzschmar,et al.  Environmental effects of driving behaviour and congestion related to passenger cars , 2000 .

[19]  Fred Feng,et al.  Can vehicle longitudinal jerk be used to identify aggressive drivers? An examination using naturalistic driving data. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  D. Parker,et al.  Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers , 1998 .

[21]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Symmetric Relationship Between Self and Others in Aggressive Driving Across Gender and Countries , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[22]  Eungcheol Kim,et al.  Estimates of Critical Values of Aggressive Acceleration from a Viewpoint of Fuel Consumption and Emissions , 2013 .

[23]  A. Khattak,et al.  Analyzing Highly Volatile Driving Trips Taken by Alternative Fuel Vehicles , 2018, 1807.03861.

[24]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Identifying and Analyzing Extreme Lane Change Events Using Basic Safety Messages in a Connected Vehicle Environment , 2018 .

[25]  C. Bhat Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences , 2003 .

[26]  Jacob Poirier,et al.  Traffic Light Assistant Simulation: Foggy Weather , 2017 .

[27]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Development of Safety Performance Functions: Incorporating Unobserved Heterogeneity and Functional Form Analysis , 2018 .

[28]  Ilsoo Yun,et al.  Stochastic Optimization for Sustainable Traffic Signal Control , 2009 .

[29]  Pete Thomas,et al.  Detecting deviation from normal driving using SHRP2 NDS data , 2017 .

[30]  Yiyi Wang,et al.  Estimating Pedestrian Exposure for Small Urban and Rural Areas , 2017 .

[31]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  How is driving volatility related to intersection safety? A Bayesian heterogeneity-based analysis of instrumented vehicles data , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[32]  Stephen Figlewski,et al.  Forecasting Volatility Using Historical Data , 1994 .

[33]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  A Framework to Process and Analyze Driver, Vehicle and Road infrastructure Volatilities in Real-time , 2018 .

[34]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Analysis of Crashes Involving Pedestrians Across the United States: Implications for Connected and Automated Vehicles , 2018 .

[35]  Fred L Mannering,et al.  A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  Hesamoddin Razi-Ardakani,et al.  Study on mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Iranian drivers , 2017, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[37]  Douglas G. Bonett,et al.  Confidence interval for a coefficient of quartile variation , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[38]  I. Han,et al.  Characteristic analysis for cognition of dangerous driving using automobile black boxes , 2009 .

[39]  Yi Lu Murphey,et al.  Driver's style classification using jerk analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Vehicular Systems.