Introduction to Handbook of Alkali-activated Cements, Mortars and Concretes

Abstract This chapter starts with an overview on relevant AACB landmarks and also on AACB problems. Important bibliographic events as well as recent progress in this field are reviewed. Some shortcomings concerning durability performance, carbon footprint and efflorescence are reviewed. Comments on the possible contributions of AACB for sustainable development and eco-efficient construction are given. These include AACB with lower carbon footprint, contribution of AACB for building energy efficiency and the capability of AACB to reuse a high waste content. An outline of the book is also given.

[1]  C. Shi,et al.  New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement , 2011 .

[2]  N. Roussel,et al.  An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends , 2011 .

[3]  A. Fernández-Jiménez,et al.  Alkali-activated based concrete , 2013 .

[4]  João A. Labrincha,et al.  Eco-efficient Construction and Building Materials , 2011 .

[5]  Stefan Lechtenböhmer,et al.  The potential for large-scale savings from insulating residential buildings in the EU , 2011 .

[6]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[7]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[8]  Anja Buchwald,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of geopolymers , 2009 .

[9]  Antonio Valero,et al.  The crepuscular planet. A model for the exhausted atmosphere and hydrosphere , 2011 .

[10]  John L. Provis,et al.  Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement , 2012 .

[11]  J. Davidovits,et al.  Geopolymeric concretes For Environmental Protection , 1990 .

[12]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Nearly Zero Energy Building Refurbishment : A Multidisciplinary Approach , 2013 .

[13]  L. Kopecký,et al.  A WEAK ALKALI BOND IN (N, K)-A-S-H GELS: EVIDENCE FROM LEACHING AND MODELING , 2012 .

[14]  J. Brus,et al.  Preparation, structure and hydrothermal stability of alternative (sodium silicate-free) geopolymers , 2007 .

[15]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[16]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  The future of construction materials research and the seventh UN Millennium Development Goal: A few insights , 2013 .

[17]  Steffen Lehmann,et al.  The zero waste index:a performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a zero waste city , 2013 .

[18]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Variation in hybrid cements over time. Alkaline activation of fly ash–portland cement blends , 2013 .

[19]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Properties and durability of HPC with tyre rubber wastes , 2012 .

[20]  H. Schellnhuber.  Global warming: Stop worrying, start panicking? , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Hongping Yuan,et al.  A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste. , 2012, Waste management.

[22]  F. Collins,et al.  Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete , 2013 .

[23]  Á. Palomo,et al.  Chemical durability of geopolymers , 2009 .

[24]  C. Shi,et al.  Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes , 2003 .

[25]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue? , 2012 .

[26]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[27]  Longtu Li,et al.  A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements , 2010 .

[28]  J. Deventer,et al.  Geopolymers : structure, processing, properties and industrial applications , 2009 .

[29]  Yubin Jun,et al.  Use of CaO as an activator for producing a price-competitive non-cement structural binder using ground granulated blast furnace slag , 2013 .

[30]  K. Seto,et al.  Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 , 2014 .

[32]  D. Roy.  Alkali-activated cements Opportunities and challenges , 1999 .

[33]  J. Deventer,et al.  The Role of Inorganic Polymer Technology in the Development of ‘Green Concrete’ , 2007 .

[34]  J. Ideker,et al.  Advances in alternative cementitious binders , 2011 .

[35]  J. Provis.  Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: why, how, and what? , 2014 .

[36]  J. Provis.  Discussion of C. Li et al., “A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements” , 2010 .

[37]  J. Deventer,et al.  Commercialization of geopolymers for construction – opportunities and obstacles , 2009 .