Demand Response Program in Smart Grid Using Supply Function Bidding Mechanism

In smart grid, customers have access to the electricity consumption and the price data via smart meters; thus, they are able to participate in the demand response (DR) programs. In this paper, we address the interaction among multiple utility companies and multiple customers in smart grid by modeling the DR problem as two noncooperative games: the supplier and customer side games. In the first game, supply function bidding mechanism is employed to model the utility companies' profit maximization problem. In the proposed mechanism, the utility companies submit their bids to the data center, where the electricity price is computed and is sent to the customers. In the second game, the price anticipating customers determine optimal shiftable load profile to maximize their daily payoff. The existence and uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium in the mentioned games are studied and a computationally tractable distributed algorithm is designed to determine the equilibrium. Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed DR method in increasing the utility companies' profit and customers' payoff, as well as in reducing the peak-to-average ratio in the aggregate load demand. Finally, the algorithm performance is compared with a DR method in the literature to demonstrate the similarities and differences.

[1]  H. Farhangi,et al.  The path of the smart grid , 2010, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[2]  Shahab Bahrami,et al.  Game Theoretic Based Charging Strategy for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  R. Green,et al.  Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[5]  Masahiro Morikura,et al.  Differential game-theoretic framework for a demand-side energy management system , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[6]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Demand Response Management With Multiple Utility Companies: A Two-Level Game Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Massoud Hashemi,et al.  Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off in Privacy-Preserving Autonomous Demand Side Management , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  J. Goodman Note on Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave N-Person Games , 1965 .

[9]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Dependable Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid: A Stackelberg Game Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  K.P. Wong,et al.  A coevolutionary approach to analyzing supply function equilibrium model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Parameterized Supply Function Bidding: Equilibrium and Efficiency , 2011, Oper. Res..

[12]  Shahab Bahrami,et al.  A modified approach for residential load scheduling using smart meters , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[13]  R. Green,et al.  Increasing Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1996 .

[14]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Decentralized control of aggregated loads for demand response , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[15]  R. Baldick,et al.  Theory and Application of Linear Supply Function Equilibrium in Electricity Markets , 2004 .

[16]  Jiming Chen,et al.  Residential Energy Consumption Scheduling: A Coupled-Constraint Game Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[17]  He Chen,et al.  Autonomous Demand Side Management Based on Energy Consumption Scheduling and Instantaneous Load Billing: An Aggregative Game Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[18]  Jiming Chen,et al.  Distributed Real-Time Demand Response in Multiseller–Multibuyer Smart Distribution Grid , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.