On the selection of optimal flip angles for T/sub 1/ mapping of breast tumors with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

We present a method for selecting optimal flip angles for both precontrast and postcontrast T/sub 1/ mapping of breast tumors using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; and with the aim of improving accuracy in the estimation of contrast medium concentration. The proposed method can appropriately account for the different ranges of pre-contrast and postcontrast T/sub 1/ values by the use of weighting functions, which also allow the flexibility to enhance the accuracy of certain T/sub 1/ values, corresponding to the tissues of interest. Results of Monte Carlo simulations show that the proposed method could yield significantly lower errors in the estimation of contrast concentration, as compared with an existing approach.

[1]  B. Rutt,et al.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  F. Kelcz,et al.  Improvement in breast lesion characterization with dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI using pharmacokinetic modeling and bookend T1 measurements , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J T Ennis,et al.  Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. , 1990, Radiology.

[4]  Yeng Chai Soh,et al.  A physiologic model of capillary-tissue exchange for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of tumor microcirculation , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  D B Kopans,et al.  Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. , 1995, Radiology.

[6]  T W Redpath,et al.  Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times with FLASH for dynamic MRI of the breast. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  M Recht,et al.  Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R. Lucht,et al.  Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: Pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D M Shames,et al.  MR imaging characterization of microvessels in experimental breast tumors by using a particulate contrast agent with histopathologic correlation. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  N J Pelc,et al.  Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  S. Riederer,et al.  Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip angles , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  G P Liney,et al.  A Simple and Realistic Tissue‐Equivalent Breast Phantom for MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  B Asselain,et al.  Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[14]  R R Edelman,et al.  Effect of oxygen inhalation on relaxation times in various tissues , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[16]  T. Helbich,et al.  Quantitative gadopentetate‐enhanced MRI of breast tumors: Testing of different analytic methods , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J. Allison,et al.  Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.