Spiking neural network and bull genetic algorithm for active vibration control

Systems with flexible structures display vibration as a characteristic property. However, when exposed to disturbing forces, then the component and/or structural nature of such systems are damaged. Therefore, this paper proposes two heuristics approaches to reduce the unwanted structural response delivered due to the external excitation; namely, bull genetic algorithm and spiking neural network. The bull genetic algorithm is based on a new selection property inherited from the bull concept. On the other hand, spiking neural network possess more than one synaptic terminal between each neural network layer and each synaptic terminal is modelled with a different period of delay. Extensive simulations have been conducted using simulated platform of a flexible beam vibration. To validate the proposed approaches, we performed a qualitative comparison with other related approaches such as traditional genetic algorithm, general regression neural network, bees algorithm, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Based on the obtained results, it is found that the proposed approaches have outperformed other approaches, while bull genetic algorithm has a 5.2% performance improvement over spiking neural network.

[1]  Alireza Tavakolpour Saleh.  Mechatronic design of intelligent active vibration control systems for flexible structures , 2010 .

[2]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Spiking Deep Networks with LIF Neurons , 2015, ArXiv.

[3]  Chih-Hung Chang,et al.  The learning problem of multi-layer neural networks , 2013, Neural Networks.

[4]  Danyang Yuan,et al.  Genetic algorithm for the optimization of features and neural networks in ECG signals classification , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Maysam F. Abbod,et al.  Modelling oil pipelines grid: Neuro-fuzzy supervision system , 2017 .

[6]  J. Sekhon,et al.  Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives , 1998, Political Analysis.

[7]  Keshav P. Dahal,et al.  Intelligent Learning Algorithms for Active Vibration Control , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[8]  Anula Khare,et al.  A review of particle swarm optimization and its applications in Solar Photovoltaic system , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  J. Fei.  Adaptive sliding mode vibration control schemes for flexible structure system , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  M. Awadalla,et al.  Neural Networks for Flow Bottom Hole Pressure Prediction , 2016 .

[11]  Zaki B. Nossair,et al.  System Identification Using Intelligent Algorithms , 2009 .

[12]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Mohamed A. Tawhid,et al.  A hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm with population partitioning for large scale optimization problems , 2017 .

[14]  R. Bennett,et al.  Convergent Evolution of a Fused Sexual Cycle Promotes the Haploid Lifestyle , 2014, Nature.

[15]  Soniya Lalwani,et al.  A comprehensive survey: Applications of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm , 2013 .

[16]  A. Elewi,et al.  Enhanced PSO Approach for Real Time Systems Scheduling , 2022 .

[17]  Shu-Nong Bai.  The concept of the sexual reproduction cycle and its evolutionary significance , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[18]  Andrzej Koszewnik,et al.  Desiginig of active vibration control system for smart structure 2-D with non-collocated piezo-elements , 2017, 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR).

[19]  Medhat Awadalla,et al.  Spiking neural network-based control chart pattern recognition , 2011 .