Mammogram segmentation by contour searching and massive lesion classification with neural network

The mammography is the most effective procedure for an early diagnosis of the breast cancer. In this paper, an algorithm for detecting massive lesions in mammographic images will be presented. The database consists of 3762 digital images acquired in several hospitals belonging to the MAGIC-5 collaboration. A reduction of the surface under investigation is achieved, without loss of meaningful information, through segmentation of the whole image, by means of a ROI Hunter algorithm. In the following classification step, feature extraction plays a fundamental role: some features give geometrical information, other ones provide shape parameters. Once the features are computed for each ROI, they are used as inputs to a supervised neural network with momentum. The output neuron provides the probability that the ROI is pathological or not. Results are provided in terms of ROC and FROC curves; the area under the ROC curve was found to be Az=(85.6plusmn0.8)%. This software is included in the CAD station actually working in the hospitals belonging to the MAGIC-5 Collaboration

[1]  U Bottigli,et al.  [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications]. , 2001, La Radiologia medica.

[2]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[3]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[5]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  F Levi,et al.  Mortality from major cancer sites in the European Union, 1955-1998. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[8]  Craig K Abbey,et al.  Computer aided detection of masses in mammography using subregion Hotelling observers. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  M. Giger,et al.  Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Hyun Wook Park,et al.  Statistical Textural Features for Detection of Microcalcifications in Digitized Mammograms , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  L. Tabár,et al.  REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985, The Lancet.

[12]  Francesco Fauci,et al.  Search of microcalcification clusters with the CALMA CAD station , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[14]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[15]  Osmar R. Zaïane,et al.  Application of Data Mining Techniques for Medical Image Classification , 2001, MDM/KDD.

[16]  Rene Vargas-Voracek,et al.  Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  S. Lai,et al.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.