Decision process in MCDM with large number of criteria and heterogeneous risk preferences

Abstract A new decision process is proposed to address the challenge that a large number criteria in the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem and the decision makers with heterogeneous risk preferences. First, from the perspective of objective data, the effective criteria are extracted based on the similarity relations between criterion values and the criteria are weighted, respectively. Second, the corresponding types of theoretic model of risk preferences expectations will be built, based on the possibility and similarity between criterion values to solve the problem for different interval numbers with the same expectation. Then, the risk preferences (Risk-seeking, risk-neutral and risk-aversion) will be embedded in the decision process. Later, the optimal decision object is selected according to the risk preferences of decision makers based on the corresponding theoretic model. Finally, a new algorithm of information aggregation model is proposed based on fairness maximization of decision results for the group decision, considering the coexistence of decision makers with heterogeneous risk preferences. The scientific rationality verification of this new method is given through the analysis of real case.

[1]  Yanyong Guan,et al.  Set-valued information systems , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Peide Liu,et al.  Generalized Hybrid Aggregation Operators Based on the 2-Dimension Uncertain Linguistic Information for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making , 2016 .

[3]  James E. Smith,et al.  Decision analysis in Management Science , 2004 .

[4]  Felipe A. Csaszar,et al.  Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation View , 2012 .

[5]  Ying Liu,et al.  An Approach to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Power Generalized Aggregation Operator , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[6]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach , 2013, Oper. Res..

[7]  Joseph Price,et al.  The Role of Risk Preferences in Pay-to-Bid Auctions , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Peide Liu,et al.  2-Dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  Felipe A. Csaszar,et al.  Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation View , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Peide Liu,et al.  A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on weighted geometric aggregation operators of interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers , 2012 .

[11]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  On the Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Jian Liu,et al.  A new decision support model in multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on risk preferences and criteria reduction , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Bo Feng,et al.  A method for stochastic multiple criteria decision making based on pairwise comparisons of alternatives with random evaluations , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers , 2005, Math. Comput. Model..

[15]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  EXTRACTING LAWS FROM DECISION TABLES: A ROUGH SET APPROACH , 1995, Comput. Intell..

[16]  Love Ekenberg,et al.  Augmenting Ordinal Methods of Attribute Weight Approximation , 2014, Decis. Anal..

[17]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A study of decision process in MCDM problems with large number of criteria , 2015, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[18]  Mirjana Strboja,et al.  An approach to pseudo-integration of set-valued functions , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[19]  Mohammed Abdellaoui,et al.  Experienced vs. Described Uncertainty: Do We Need Two Prospect Theory Specifications? , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Juuso Liesiö,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions for Portfolio Decision Analysis , 2014, Decis. Anal..

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[23]  Zhong-Zhong Jiang,et al.  A method for member selection of R&D teams using the individual and collaborative information , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Peide Liu,et al.  The generalized hybrid weighted average operator based on interval neutrosophic hesitant set and its application to multiple attribute decision making , 2015, Neural Computing and Applications.

[25]  Ying Luo,et al.  Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[26]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough sets: Some extensions , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Nikolaos Trichakis,et al.  Fairness and Efficiency in Multiportfolio Optimization , 2014, Oper. Res..

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[30]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Anniversary Article: Decision Analysis in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..