The American Voter Revisited

The presidential elections of 2000 and 2004 will be remembered as two of the most contentious and polarizing political events in American history.In an attempt to understand what happened during these historic elections, "The American Voter Revisited" recreates the outstanding classic from 1960, "The American Voter", following the same format, theory, and mode of analysis as the original."The American Voter Revisited" examines how contemporary voters decide, using the lens of the 1960 text, which was based on the presidential elections of 1952 and 1956. In this new volume, the ideas and methods of "The American Voter" are tested against presidential election surveys from 2000 and 2004. In a fascinating account, the contemporary American voter is found to behave politically in a fashion surprisingly similar to voters of the 1950s. Yet, some things have changed. For one, the recent intense polarization of the two leading political parties has heightened the ideological tenor of American politics.The organization of "The American Voter Revisited" follows closely the original book. Its fifteen chapters - about political attitudes, the political context, the social and economic context, and the electoral decision - parallel chapters in "The American Voter", from the title itself to the style to the analytical framework. The aim is to reproduce the theory and the tables of the original but with an entirely new and up-to-date data set. In particular, where "The American Voter" concentrated on an understanding of voters through examination of the National Presidential Election Surveys of 1952 and 1956, this book studies the National Presidential Election Surveys of 2000 and 2004. In addition, each chapter includes a Comment and Controversy section, which brings the reader up-to-date on the numerous scholarly and political questions that the material of the chapter has generated over the years.Just as "The American Voter" turned out to be a model text, "The American Voter Revisited" is sure to become a classic in the study of voter behavior and psychology.

[1]  Robert Andersen,et al.  The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions , 2006, The Journal of Politics.

[2]  D. Green,et al.  The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[3]  L. Atkeson Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement , 2003 .

[4]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings , 1978 .

[5]  N. Nie,et al.  Revisiting Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Or, Doing Research is Like Watching a Tennis Match: Response , 1979 .

[6]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[7]  Michael S. Lewis-Beck Modelers v. Pollsters: The Election Forecasts Debate , 2001 .

[8]  Brad T. Gomez,et al.  Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution , 2001 .

[9]  James N. Druckman,et al.  On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  G. Rabinowitz On the Nature of Political Issues: Insights from a Spatial Analysis , 1978 .

[11]  Diana C. Mutz Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience , 1992 .

[12]  V. Key Secular Realignment and the Party System , 1959, The Journal of Politics.

[13]  John R. Petrocik,et al.  The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap , 1999 .

[14]  William G. Jacoby Public Attitudes toward Government Spending , 1994 .

[15]  S. Feldman,et al.  The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State , 1992 .

[16]  Paul N. Goren Core Principles and Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics: A Test of Two Theories , 2001, British Journal of Political Science.

[17]  Jane J. Mansbridge Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes" , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[18]  William G. Jacoby Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending , 2000 .

[19]  G. Gurin,et al.  The Voter Decides , 1954 .

[20]  H. Norpoth Presidents and the Prospective Voter , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[21]  Alan I. Abramowitz An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes , 1988 .

[22]  D. Andrich An Elaboration of Guttman Scaling with Rasch Models for Measurement , 1985 .

[23]  Donald E. Stokes,et al.  Spatial Models of Party Competition , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[24]  Ray C. Fair,et al.  The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President , 1978 .

[25]  G. Iversen,et al.  ON THE EXISTENCE OF FORCES RESTORING PARTY COMPETITION , 1962 .

[26]  Martha Kropf,et al.  Voided Ballots in the 1996 Presidential Election: A County-Level Analysis , 2003, The Journal of Politics.

[27]  Danny Hayes Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership , 2005 .

[28]  Steven E. Finkel,et al.  A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising , 1998 .

[29]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory. , 1993 .

[30]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  On Attempting to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model: Sometimes the Patient Just Can't Be Helped , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[31]  Dean Lacy,et al.  Economic Performance, Job Insecurity and Electoral Choice , 2002 .

[32]  H. Norpoth Divided Government and Economic Voting , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[33]  Martin Gilens,et al.  Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy , 1999 .

[34]  Laurie A. Rhodebeck The Politics of Greed? Political Preferences among the Elderly , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[35]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  A Social Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal , 1990 .

[36]  R. Rich,et al.  Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[37]  M. Lewis-Beck Agrarian Political Behavior in the United States , 1977 .

[38]  K. Andersen,et al.  The Creation of a Democratic Majority, 1928-1936 , 1979 .

[39]  Gregory B. Markus,et al.  The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis , 1988 .

[40]  P. Converse,et al.  Political Representation in France , 1986 .

[41]  Introduction—Assessments of the 2004 Presidential Vote Forecasts , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[42]  T. Rudolph,et al.  Value Conflict, Group Affect, and the Issue of Campaign Finance , 2003 .

[43]  S. Bates,et al.  The Spot: The Rise of Political Advertising on Television , 1984 .

[44]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Values as Truisms: Evidence and , 1998 .

[45]  Greg D. Adams,et al.  Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution , 1997 .

[46]  S. Feldman Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values , 1988 .

[47]  Keith T. Poole,et al.  RECOVERING A BASIC SPACE FROM A SET OF ISSUE SCALES , 1998 .

[48]  P. Sniderman,et al.  Policy Reasoning and Political Values: The Problem of Racial Equality , 1984 .

[49]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  New Measures of Issue Salience: An Evaluation , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[50]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  The Measurement of Public Opinion about Public Policy: A Report on Some New Issue Question Formats* , 1982 .

[51]  D. Rivers Heterogeneity in Models of Electoral Choice , 1988 .

[52]  J. Sullivan,et al.  The Application of Individual Differences Scaling to the Measurement of Political Ideologies , 1974 .

[53]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Basis for Decision: An Attitudinal Analysis of Voting Behavior1 , 1974 .

[54]  M. Weatherford Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: Class Differences in the Political Response to Recession , 1978 .

[55]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  Sophistry versus Science: On Further Efforts to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[56]  Jeffery J. Mondak Developing Valid Knowledge Scales , 2001 .

[57]  Eric R. A. N. Smith The Unchanging American Voter , 1989 .

[58]  Norman H. Nie,et al.  The Changing American Voter. , 1976 .

[59]  P. J. Conover,et al.  How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model , 1984 .

[60]  David Butler,et al.  Political change in Britain , 1974 .

[61]  Tim Groseclose,et al.  A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage , 2001 .

[62]  William G. Jacoby Data Theory and Dimensional Analysis , 1991 .

[63]  Alfred J. Tuchfarber,et al.  Change in the Structure of American Political Attitudes: The Nagging Question of Question Wording , 1978 .

[64]  Darren W. Davis,et al.  Postmaterialism in World Societies: Is It Really a Value Dimension? , 1999 .

[65]  Paul R. Abramson,et al.  Who Overreports Voting? , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[66]  J. Thomassen The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies , 2005 .

[67]  John R. Petrocik Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study , 1996 .