Layer-Based Modelling of the Earth’s Gravitational Potential up to 10-km Scale in Spherical Harmonics in Spherical and Ellipsoidal Approximation

Global forward modelling of the Earth’s gravitational potential, a classical problem in geophysics and geodesy, is relevant for a range of applications such as gravity interpretation, isostatic hypothesis testing or combined gravity field modelling with high and ultra-high resolution. This study presents spectral forward modelling with volumetric mass layers to degree 2190 for the first time based on two different levels of approximation. In spherical approximation, the mass layers are referred to a sphere, yielding the spherical topographic potential. In ellipsoidal approximation where an ellipsoid of revolution provides the reference, the ellipsoidal topographic potential (ETP) is obtained. For both types of approximation, we derive a mass layer concept and study it with layered data from the Earth2014 topography model at 5-arc-min resolution. We show that the layer concept can be applied with either actual layer density or density contrasts w.r.t. a reference density, without discernible differences in the computed gravity functionals. To avoid aliasing and truncation errors, we carefully account for increased sampling requirements due to the exponentiation of the boundary functions and consider all numerically relevant terms of the involved binominal series expansions. The main outcome of our work is a set of new spectral models of the Earth’s topographic potential relying on mass layer modelling in spherical and in ellipsoidal approximation. We compare both levels of approximations geometrically, spectrally and numerically and quantify the benefits over the frequently used rock-equivalent topography (RET) method. We show that by using the ETP it is possible to avoid any displacement of masses and quantify also the benefit of mapping-free modelling. The layer-based forward modelling is corroborated by GOCE satellite gradiometry, by in-situ gravity observations from recently released Antarctic gravity anomaly grids and degree correlations with spectral models of the Earth’s observed geopotential. As the main conclusion of this work, the mass layer approach allows more accurate modelling of the topographic potential because it avoids 10–20-mGal approximation errors associated with RET techniques. The spherical approximation is suited for a range of geophysical applications, while the ellipsoidal approximation is preferable for applications requiring high accuracy or high resolution.

[1]  M. Wieczorek,et al.  10.05 – Gravity and Topography of the Terrestrial Planets , 2007 .

[2]  Gábor Papp,et al.  The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism , 2000 .

[3]  Use of Topography in the context of the GOCE satellite mission, some examples , 2015 .

[4]  New Geoid of Greenland: A Case Study of Terrain and Ice Effects, GOCE and Use of Local Sea Level Data , 2015 .

[5]  Robert Tenzer,et al.  Harmonic coefficients of the Earth’s Spectral Crustal Model 180 – ESCM180 , 2014, Earth Science Informatics.

[6]  W. Wal,et al.  On a spectral method for forward gravity field modelling , 2016 .

[7]  Kurt Seitz,et al.  A Wavelet-Based Assessment of Topographic-Isostatic Reductions for GOCE Gravity Gradients , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[8]  C. Hirt,et al.  Spectral analysis of the Earth’s topographic potential via 2D-DFT: a new data-based degree variance model to degree 90,000 , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[9]  Rene Forsberg,et al.  A Study of Terrain Reductions, Density Anomalies and Geophysical Inversion Methods in Gravity Field Modelling , 1984 .

[10]  Christian Hirt,et al.  Earth2014: 1 arc-min shape, topography, bedrock and ice-sheet models - Available as gridded data and degree-10, 800 spherical harmonics , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  C. Amante,et al.  ETOPO1 arc-minute global relief model : procedures, data sources and analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Roland Pail,et al.  A new degree-2190 (10 km resolution) gravity field model for Antarctica developed from GRACE, GOCE and Bedmap2 data , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[13]  D. Nagy,et al.  Corrections to “The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism” , 2002 .

[14]  R. Rapp Degree variances of the Earth's potential, topography and its isostatic compensation , 1982 .

[15]  Michael Kuhn,et al.  Comparison of Newton’s Integral in the Space and Frequency Domains , 2005 .

[16]  C. Hirt,et al.  Ellipsoidal topographic potential: New solutions for spectral forward gravity modeling of topography with respect to a reference ellipsoid , 2013 .

[17]  A. Jäggi,et al.  Can GOCE help to improve temporal gravity field estimates , 2011 .

[18]  A. Eicker,et al.  ITG-Grace2010: the new GRACE gravity field release computed in Bonn , 2010 .

[19]  G. Masters,et al.  CRUST1.0: An Updated Global Model of Earth's Crust , 2012 .

[20]  Juraj Janák,et al.  Code and readme of a MATLAB-based graphical user interface program for computing functionals of the geopotential , 2013 .

[21]  Michael Bartusch,et al.  The TanDEM-X Mission , 2008 .

[22]  Christian Hirt,et al.  Evaluation of intermediate TanDEM-X digital elevation data products over Tasmania using other digital elevation models and accurate heights from the Australian National Gravity Database , 2016 .

[23]  Christian Hirt,et al.  Band‐limited topographic mass distribution generates full‐spectrum gravity field: Gravity forward modeling in the spectral and spatial domains revisited , 2014 .

[24]  Kurt Seitz,et al.  A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling , 2007 .

[25]  P. Novák,et al.  Contribution of mass density heterogeneities to the quasigeoid-to-geoid separation , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[26]  R. Rummel,et al.  A Geodetic View on Isostatic Models , 2009 .

[27]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  A spherical harmonic analysis of the Earth's topography , 1967 .

[28]  Reiner Rummel,et al.  Comparisons of global topographic/isostatic models to the Earth's observed gravity field , 1988 .

[29]  Shuanggen Jin,et al.  Analysis of the Refined CRUST1.0 Crustal Model and its Gravity Field , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[30]  R. Tenzer,et al.  The spherical harmonic representation of the gravitational field quantities generated by the ice density contrast , 2010 .

[31]  R. Bell,et al.  New Antarctic gravity anomaly grid for enhanced geodetic and geophysical studies in Antarctica , 2016, Geophysical research letters.

[32]  Gabi Laske,et al.  LITHO1.0: An Updated Crust and Lithosphere Model of the Earth (Postprint) , 2012 .

[33]  Richard H. Rapp,et al.  The development of an isostatic gravitational model to degree 360 and its use in global gravity modelling , 1990 .

[34]  Roland Pail,et al.  New ultrahigh‐resolution picture of Earth's gravity field , 2013 .

[35]  G. Masters,et al.  LITHO1.0 - An Updated Crust and Lithospheric Model of the Earth Developed Using Multiple Data Constraints , 2012 .

[36]  W. Featherstone,et al.  Topographic/isostatic evaluation of newgeneration GOCE gravity field models , 2012 .

[37]  C. Hirt,et al.  Ultra-high-Degree Surface Spherical Harmonic Analysis Using the Gauss–Legendre and the Driscoll/Healy Quadrature Theorem and Application to Planetary Topography Models of Earth, Mars and Moon , 2015, Surveys in Geophysics.

[38]  Christian Hirt,et al.  Efficient and accurate high-degree spherical harmonic synthesis of gravity field functionals at the Earth’s surface using the gradient approach , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[39]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  The combined satellite gravity field model GOCO05s , 2015 .

[40]  M. Wieczorek,et al.  Gravity and Topography of the Terrestrial Planets , 2015 .

[41]  M. Kuhn,et al.  Topographic gravitational potential up to second-order derivatives: an examination of approximation errors caused by rock-equivalent topography (RET) , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[42]  Juraj Janák,et al.  A MATLAB-based graphical user interface program for computing functionals of the geopotential up to ultra-high degrees and orders: Efficient computation at irregular surfaces , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[43]  Fernando Sansò,et al.  Harmonic Calculus and Global Gravity Models , 2013 .

[44]  Thomas Gruber,et al.  Global gravity field modeling based on GOCE and complementary gravity data , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[45]  Wenke Sun,et al.  Convergence and optimal truncation of binomial expansions used in isostatic compensations and terrain corrections , 2001 .

[46]  W. M. Kaula Theory of satellite geodesy , 1966 .

[47]  Thomas Gruber,et al.  Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights , 2011 .

[48]  Kurt Seitz,et al.  The Rock–Water–Ice Topographic Gravity Field Model RWI_TOPO_2015 and Its Comparison to a Conventional Rock-Equivalent Version , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[49]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  EGM_TIM_RL05: An independent geoid with centimeter accuracy purely based on the GOCE mission , 2014 .

[50]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  Terrain-Related Gravimetric Quantities Computed for the Next EGM , 2006 .

[51]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 ( EGM 2008 ) , 2012 .

[52]  Sten Claessens Solutions to ellipsoidal boundary value problems for gravity field modelling , 2006 .

[53]  Georges Balmino,et al.  Spherical harmonic modelling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[54]  Kurt Seitz,et al.  Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.