A new perspective on de-individuation via computer-mediated communication

Research examining de-individuation via computer-mediated communication (CMC) suggests that group pressure is more pronounced in CMC-using groups than in groups meeting face to face, because CMC strips away non-verbal cues and makes individuals feel more similar to the others in their group. Similarly, electronic voting research suggests that group influence is more pronounced via group support systems when the opinions of others are communicated in real time. However, recent research involving complete anonymity suggests that group influence is mitigated via anonymous CMC because of a lack of awareness of others. Thus, we propose that increased group influence is facilitated when others’ opinions are communicated, and is heightened with the common identity created through the use of nominal labels. This paper reports the results of a laboratory experiment involving groups making an organization decision via a text-based chat room. The results show that a simple electronic voting interface element increased the amount of group influence on individual members, and led to decreased participation and higher dispensability.

[1]  Peng Xu,et al.  Supporting dynamic group decision and negotiation processes: A traceability augmented peer-to-peer network approach , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[2]  The Role of Role Playing in Organizational Research , 1993 .

[3]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[4]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Effects of Source and Participant Anonymity and Difference in Initial Opinions in an EMS Context , 1998 .

[5]  J. George.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations , 1992 .

[6]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[7]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Russell Haines,et al.  The Influence of workspace awareness on group intellective decision effectiveness , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems , 1992 .

[10]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Experimental Tests of Normative Group Influence and Representation Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication: When Interacting Via Computers Differs from Interacting With Computers. , 2002 .

[11]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[12]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[13]  Rebecca J. Welch Cline.  Detecting groupthink: Methods for observing the illusion of unanimity , 1990 .

[14]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  The Impact of Certain Communication Nets Upon Organization and Performance in Task-Oriented Groups , 1955 .

[15]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  Social dilemmas, subgroups, and motivation loss in task-oriented groups : in search of an «optimal» team size in division of work , 1992 .

[16]  G. L. Bon,et al.  Scientific Literature: The Crowd. A Study of the Popular Mind , 1897 .

[17]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[18]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[19]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[20]  Lawrence J. Sanna,et al.  Group Performance And Interaction , 1998 .

[21]  J. McGrath,et al.  Groups Interacting with Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues and an Agenda , 1993 .

[22]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. , 1976 .

[23]  Eun-Ju Lee.  Effects of Visual Representation on Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Tests of the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects. , 2004 .

[24]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement-Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Incentives and Computing Systems for Team-Based Organizations , 1995 .

[26]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Organizational context and face-to-face interaction: Influences on the development of trust and collaborative behaviors in computer-mediated groups , 2009 .

[27]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  From Groupthink to Teamthink: Toward the Creation of Constructive Thought Patterns in Self-Managing Work Teams , 1994 .

[28]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. , 1982 .

[29]  T. Postmes,et al.  Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Towards a Practice Understanding of the Creation of Awareness in Distributed Work , 2007, ICIS.

[31]  Donald P. Robin,et al.  The Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue as an Influence on the Ethical Decision-Making of Ad Managers , 1996 .

[32]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Decision making performance of interacting groups: an experimental investigation of the effects of task type and communication mode , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  The Role of Role Playing in Organizational Research , 1993 .

[34]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A New Conceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Russell Haines,et al.  Participation and Persuasion via Computer-Mediated Communication: Anonymous versus Identified Comments , 2006, ICIS.

[36]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[37]  P. McLeod.  Anonymity and consensus in computer-supported group decision making , 2000 .

[38]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Social comparison processes in organizations , 2007 .

[39]  J. Wagner.  Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in Groups , 1995 .

[40]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[41]  Brian Whitworth,et al.  Generating Agreement in Computer-Mediated Groups , 2001 .