A spatial statistics approach to characterizing and modeling the structure of cognitive wireless networks

The performance of cognitive wireless networks (CWNs) depends heavily on their spatial structure. However, highly simplified models are still routinely used for performance evaluation of CWNs and other wireless networks, with node locations often being assumed to be uniformly and randomly distributed in a given region. In this paper we apply techniques from spatial statistics literature to show that this assumption is not valid for a wide variety of existing networks, and neither can it be expected to hold for future cognitive wireless networks. We also develop improved models of the spatial structure of the network for a variety of wireless network types. In particular, we construct models of television and radio transmitter distributions as well as different types of cellular and Wi–Fi networks that have direct applications in cognitive wireless networks research. We use a stochastic approach based on fitting parametric location models to empirical data. Our results strongly indicate that the so-called Geyer saturation model can accurately reproduce the spatial structure of a large variety of wireless network types, arising from both planned or chaotic deployments. The resulting models can be used in simulations or as basis of analytical calculations to study different network properties. They can be also used within CWNs for on-line reasoning about the surrounding radio environment. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns , 1998, Advances in Applied Probability.

[2]  Janne Riihijarvi,et al.  Characterizing wireless networks by spatial correlations , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[3]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[4]  A. Karr Point Processes and Their Statistical Inference. , 1994 .

[5]  J. Møller,et al.  Aalborg Universitet Properties of residuals for spatial point processes , 2022 .

[6]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Interference and Outage in Clustered Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Mathematics and the Internet: A Source of Enormous Confusion and Great Potential , 2009, The Best Writing on Mathematics 2010.

[9]  Charles J. Geyer,et al.  Likelihood inference for spatial point processes , 2019, Stochastic Geometry.

[10]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Cognitive Radios for Spectrum Sharing , 2009 .

[11]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Residual analysis for spatial point processes (with discussion) , 2005 .

[12]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Statistical characterization of transmitter locations based on signal strength measurements , 2010, IEEE 5th International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing 2010.

[13]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes , 2005 .

[14]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[15]  Zhongding Lei,et al.  IEEE 802.22: The first cognitive radio wireless regional area network standard , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  François Baccelli,et al.  Impact of interferences on connectivity in ad hoc networks , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  H. H. Xia A simplified analytical model for predicting path loss in urban and suburban environments , 1997 .

[18]  Sai Shankar Nandagopalan,et al.  IEEE 802.22: An Introduction to the First Wireless Standard based on Cognitive Radios , 2006, J. Commun..

[19]  Janne Riihijarvi,et al.  Modeling Spatial Structure of Wireless Communication Networks , 2010, 2010 INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops.

[20]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Achievable Transmission Capacity of Secondary System in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[22]  S. Low,et al.  The "robust yet fragile" nature of the Internet. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[24]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  A Survey of Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[25]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Studying the Relationships between Spatial Structures of Wireless Networks and Population Densities , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[26]  Henry L. Bertoni,et al.  Unified approach to prediction of propagation over buildings for all ranges of base station antenna height , 1993 .

[27]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[28]  Kate Harrison,et al.  How Much White-Space Capacity Is There? , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[29]  D. J. Strauss A model for clustering , 1975 .

[30]  Walter Willinger,et al.  In search of the elusive ground truth: the internet's as-level connectivity structure , 2008, SIGMETRICS '08.

[31]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  Assessment of urban-scale wireless networks with a small number of measurements , 2008, MobiCom '08.