Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Telephone Counseling Intervention in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 Mutation Carriers

Authors' A for Familial and 2Depa Departmen of Columb Health and California; and 5Cent Departmen Pennsylvan Women's H Cancer Re Denver, C Northweste Note: An ea ioral Medici Correspon Whitehaven 202-687-15

[1]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress: Appraisal and Coping , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Management Updates for Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation , 2012, Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.

[3]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[4]  Suzanne O'Neill,et al.  Randomized trial of a decision aid for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: impact on measures of decision making and satisfaction. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  H. Valdimarsdottir,et al.  Telephone genetic counseling for high-risk women undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: rationale and development of a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Genetic testing.

[6]  J. Coyne,et al.  Peer‐support in coping with medical uncertainty: discussion of oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy on a web‐based message board , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[7]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[8]  H. Valdimarsdottir,et al.  Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.

[9]  S. Domchek,et al.  Satisfaction with genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American women. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  S. Vadaparampil,et al.  Psychosocial and behavioral impact of genetic counseling and testing. , 2006, Breast disease.

[11]  B. Peshkin.  Breast cancer risk assessment and genetic testing: complexities, conundrums, and community. , 2006, Breast disease.

[12]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Enhanced Counseling for Women Undergoing BRCA1/2 Testing: Impact on Subsequent Decision Making About Risk Reduction Behaviors , 2005, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[13]  H. Valdimarsdottir,et al.  Decision making and decision support for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[14]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Affect, risk, and decision making. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[15]  J. Struewing,et al.  BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: Effectiveness of problem‐solving training as a counseling intervention , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[16]  D. Cella,et al.  Predictors of Cognitive Appraisals Following Genetic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations , 2004, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[17]  B. Peshkin,et al.  Predictors of participation in psychosocial telephone counseling following genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[18]  D. Cella,et al.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[19]  A. Marcus,et al.  Telephone counseling in psychosocial oncology: a report from the Cancer Information and Counseling Line. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  C. Isaacs,et al.  All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. , 2002, American journal of medical genetics.

[21]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J. Coyne,et al.  Overemphasis of psychological risks of genetic testing may have "dire" consequences. , 2002, Psychosomatics.

[23]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Communicating Genetic Test Results to the Family: A Six‐Step, Skills‐Building Strategy , 2001, Family & community health.

[24]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. , 2001, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[25]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[26]  J. Coyne,et al.  Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families. , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[27]  A. Patenaude,et al.  Anticipated versus actual emotional reactions to disclosure of results of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility: findings from p53 and BRCA1 testing programs. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  G. Glendon,et al.  A supportive–expressive group intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer: results of a phase II study , 2000, Psycho-oncology.

[29]  O. Dalgard,et al.  The meaning and significance of caseness: the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview II , 1999, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[30]  M F Huque,et al.  Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  B. Rimer,et al.  Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  S. Edgell,et al.  Effect of violation of normality on the t test of the correlation coefficient. , 1984 .

[34]  L. Covi,et al.  The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. , 1974, Behavioral science.