Adaptive Behavior Tom Froese Enaction From adaptive behavior to human cognition : a review of

Critics of the paradigm of enaction have long argued that enactive principles will be unable to account for the traditional domain of orthodox cognitive science, namely “higher-level” cognition and specifically human cognition. Moreover, even many of the paradigm’s “lower-level” insights into embodiment and situatedness appear to be amenable to a functionalist reinterpretation. In this review, I show on the basis of the recently published collection of papers, Enaction, that the paradigm of enaction has (a) a unique foundation in the notion of sense-making that places fundamental limits on the scope of functionalist appropriation; (b) a unique perspective on higher-level cognition that sets important new research directions without the need for the concept of mental representation; (c) a new concept of specifically human cognition in terms of second-order sense-making; and (d) a rich variety of approaches to explain the evolutionary, historical, and developmental origins of this sophisticated human ability. I also indicate how studies of the role of embodiment for abstract human cognition can strengthen their position by reconceiving their notion of embodiment in enactive terms.

[1]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[2]  O. Gapenne Kinesthesia and the Construction of Perceptual Objects , 2010 .

[3]  G. Colombetti Enaction, Sense-Making and Emotion , 2013 .

[4]  J. Stewart Foundational Issues in Enaction as a Paradigm for Cognitive Science: From the Origin of Life to Consciousness and Writing , 2010 .

[5]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[6]  M. Sheets‐Johnstone Thinking in Movement: Further Analyses and Validations , 2010 .

[7]  Renaud Barbaras,et al.  Life and Exteriority: The Problem of Metabolism , 2010 .

[8]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[9]  Rafael Núñez,et al.  Enacting Infinity: Bringing Transfinite Cardinals into Being , 2010 .

[10]  Marina Basu The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[11]  J. Lewis-Williams The mind in the cave : consciousness and the origins of art , 2002 .

[12]  Kevin Warwick Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence , 2003 .

[13]  E. Thompson,et al.  Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience , 2005 .

[14]  M. Wheeler Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step , 2005 .

[15]  P. Schuster,et al.  Networks in Molecular Evolution A Common Theme at All Levels , 2003 .

[16]  Tom Froese,et al.  The Enactive Torch: A New Tool for the Science of Perception , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[17]  A. Engel Directive Minds: How Dynamics Shapes Cognition , 2010 .

[18]  Evan Thompson,et al.  Embodiment or envatment? Reflections on the bodily basis of consciousness , 2010 .

[19]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Development through Sensorimotor Coordination , 2010 .

[20]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society , 2011 .

[22]  F. Varela,et al.  Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality , 2002 .

[23]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Networks in molecular evolution , 2002 .

[24]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Tom Froese,et al.  Life After Ashby: Ultrastability and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Autonomy , 2010, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[26]  M. Rohde,et al.  Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play , 2010 .

[27]  B. Shanon Toward a Phenomenological Psychology of the Conscious , 2010 .

[28]  Michel Le Van Quyen,et al.  Neurodynamics and Phenomenology in Mutual Enlightenment: the example of the epileptic aura , 2008 .

[29]  Véronique Havelange,et al.  The Ontological Constitution of Cognition and the Epistemological Constitution of Cognitive Science: Phenomenology, Enaction, and Technology , 2010 .

[30]  Didier Bottineau,et al.  Language and enaction , 2008 .

[31]  H. Jonas The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology , 1966 .

[32]  Tom Froese,et al.  Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis , 2009 .