Niche Management and its Contribution to Regime Change: The Case of Innovation in Sanitation

Abstract Strategic niche management (SNM) implies that new technologies are applied in so-called niches, in which they are protected against mainstream market selection. A major question currently subject to debate is through which processes niches can bring about any wider changes at the level of socio-technical regimes. This paper examines this question, using present-day developments in innovation in sanitation in Western Europe as an example. It is concluded that although SNM theorists emphasize the importance of (first- and second-order) learning, such learning processes are often hampered in practice. This may be due to the fact that existing niche-based approaches put too much emphasis on technological experimentation rather than on experimentation with forms of social organization. Therefore, attention should be redirected to sustainability concepts and guiding principles rather than technologies. As an addition to existing approaches, the authors suggest and elaborate on a new form of niche management called conceptual niche management.

[1]  K. Matthias Weber,et al.  Foresight and Adaptive Planning as Complementary Elements in Anticipatory Policy-making: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach , 2006 .

[2]  B. V. Vliet The sustainable transformation of sanitation , 2006 .

[3]  Audley Genus,et al.  On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[4]  H. Krantz,et al.  Matter that matters : A study of household routines in a process of changing water and sanitation arrangements , 2005 .

[5]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy , 2005 .

[6]  Halina Szejnwald Brown,et al.  Bounded Socio-Technical Experiments (BSTEs): Higher Order Learning for Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility , 2004 .

[7]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Managing the Transition to Sustainable Mobility , 2004 .

[8]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[9]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment , 2002 .

[10]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[11]  J. Magid,et al.  Urine separation - Swedish experiences. , 2001 .

[12]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[13]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms : theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings , 1998 .

[14]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Social experiments in the development of environmental technology: a bottom-up perspective , 1995 .

[15]  Johan Schot,et al.  Strategies for shifting technological systems : the case of the automobile system , 1994 .

[16]  Colin J. Bennett,et al.  The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change , 1992 .

[17]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .