Effects of the lining material, thickness and coverage on residual stress of class II molar restorations by multilayer technique

OBJECTIVE This study aims to analyse the influence of different lining material, thickness and coverage on residual stress of class II molar restoration by the multilayer technique through the three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) method. The objective is to reveal the correlations between the base layer configurations and the residual stress distributions of the tooth. METHODS A 3D reconstructed model of an extracted first molar was built through micro-CT images and a class II mesio-occlusal-distal cavity was prepared using computer-aided engineering (CAE) software. A bilayer technique was then applied, and 3D FE analyses were performed under polymerization contraction loading. Glass ionomer composites (Vitrebond and Ionosit) and flowable composite resin (Luxa Flow and Z350 Flowable Restorative) were used as lining materials. Moreover, several sensitivity analyses with dozens of hypothetical lining materials were conducted to provide definitive results. The thickness of the base layers was set to be distinct (0.5 mm or 1 mm) so as to reveal its effect on the stress alleviation. Various lining strategies with the liner covering different areas of the cavity walls (Closed Sandwich, Open Sandwich and Special Open Sandwich) were adopted to determine the effects of the base layers. RESULTS Adoption of an appropriate liner could effectively reduce the polymerization shrinkage stress. The mechanical properties of the base layer can affect the residual stresses, basically a lower Young's modulus and lower Poisson's ratio (of lining material) result in better stress mitigation, therefore reducing the stress transmitted to the dentin. Increase of the lining thickness within a certain range could lead to a decrease in the probability of stress concentration formation. Lining strategies had the strongest influence on the stress distributions. Different lining coverage could cause various stress responses, and covering all cavity walls with the lining material had the optimal performance among all the simulations in this study. SIGNIFICANCE The multilayer technique is an effective way to prolong the service life of resin composites restorations. A thorough evaluation of the sandwich technique through the FE method can provide a better understanding of the stress distributions of the restoration, and reveal its internal mechanisms.

[1]  Antheunis Versluis,et al.  Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  D. Achilias,et al.  Thermal expansion characteristics of light-cured dental resins and resin composites. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[3]  P. Ausiello,et al.  The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations. , 2017, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  P. Ausiello,et al.  CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials. , 2017, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[6]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study. , 2019, American journal of dentistry.

[7]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[8]  D. Watts,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  Pascal Magne,et al.  Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  F. Pla,et al.  Shrinkage stress in light-cured composite resins: influence of material and photoactivation mode. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  P. Ausiello,et al.  Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling. , 2017, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  Antonio Apicella,et al.  Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations--a 3D finite element analysis. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  C. Davidson,et al.  Complete Marginal Seal of Class V Resin Composite Restorations Effected by Increased Flexibility , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[14]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  N. Opdam,et al.  Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  G. Pearson,et al.  Cusp movement in molar teeth using dentine adhesives and composite filling materials. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[17]  C. Davidson,et al.  Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Stresses by Flow in Dental Composites , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[18]  R. Randall,et al.  Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites. , 1998, Dental Materials.

[19]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA , 2020, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[20]  J. Fuller,et al.  The fracture strength of amalgam overlying base materials. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  U. Pallesen,et al.  A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  A. Reis,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  G. Unterbrink,et al.  Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": literature review and clinical recommendations. , 1999, Quintessence international.

[24]  M. Burrow,et al.  Comparison between published clinical success of direct resin composite restorations in vital posterior teeth in 1995–2005 and 2006–2016 periods , 2017, Australian dental journal.

[25]  Minh N Luong,et al.  Cross-sectional imaging of tooth bonding interface after thermal stresses and mechanical fracture. , 2018, Dental materials journal.