Experiencing nearby locations together in time: the role of spatiotemporal contiguity in children's memory for location.

Three studies investigated how experiencing nearby locations together in time influences memory for location. Seven-, 9-, and 11-year-old children and adults learned 20 object locations in a small-scale space. The space was divided into regions by lines or walls. In Study 1, participants learned the locations either region by region or in a random order. Following learning, participants replaced the objects without the aid of the dots marking the locations and the boundaries subdividing the space. They replaced the objects in any order they chose. After experiencing the locations in random orders during learning, only adults underestimated distances between locations belonging to the same group (i.e., region). Conversely, 9- and 11-year-old children and adults who had experienced the locations region by region during learning underestimated these distances. These findings suggest that experiencing nearby locations together in time increases the weight children assign to categorical information in their estimates of location. Results from Studies 2 and 3 in which participants learned the locations region by region and then replaced the objects region by region (Study 2) or in a random order (Study 3) were similar, highlighting the importance of spatiotemporal cues in memory for location. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

[1]  E. Sandberg,et al.  Cognitive Constraints on the Development of Hierarchical Spatial Organization Skills , 1999 .

[2]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Bias in spatial location due to categorization: comment on Tversky and Schiano. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  G. Lange.  The development of conceptual and rote recall skills among school age children. , 1973 .

[4]  Kelly L. Madole,et al.  Infants' object examining: Habituation and categorization ☆ ☆☆ , 1991 .

[5]  T. McNamara,et al.  Spatial and temporal contributions to the structure of spatial memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  R Fivush.  Learning about school: the development of kindergartners' school scripts. , 1984, Child development.

[7]  Gabriel A. Radvansky,et al.  Mental Organization of Maps , 1998 .

[8]  P C Quinn,et al.  The categorization of above and below spatial relations by young infants. , 1994, Child development.

[9]  M. Naus,et al.  Rehearsal and Organizational Processes in Children's Memory. , 1975 .

[10]  B McCabe,et al.  Memory for locations within regions: Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[11]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  The Coding of Spatial Location in Young Children , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  E. Markman,et al.  Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. , 1987, Child development.

[13]  John P Spencer,et al.  Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Michael Cole,et al.  Development of free recall learning in children. , 1971 .

[15]  H. Rollins,et al.  Associative and categorical hypotheses of organization in the free recall of adults and children , 1985 .

[16]  C. Mervis.  On the existence of prelinguistic categories: A case study , 1985 .

[17]  J. Mandler,et al.  Concept formation in infancy , 1993 .

[18]  J. Mandler,et al.  Taxonomies and triads: Conceptual organization in one- to two-year-olds , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Robert Cohen,et al.  Cognitive Maps of a Naturalistic Setting. , 1978 .

[20]  J. Dixon,et al.  Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 2001 .

[21]  R C Sherman,et al.  Determinants of spatial priming in environmental memory , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[22]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  What do misestimations and asymmetries in spatial judgement indicate about spatial representation , 1999 .

[23]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[24]  P. Quinn,et al.  Development of Categorical Representations for "Above" and "Below" Spatial Relations in 3- to 7-Month-Old Infants. , 1996 .

[25]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  The development of hierarchical representation of two-dimensional space. , 1996, Child development.

[26]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Cognitive maps in children and men. , 1974, Child development.

[27]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[28]  J. Plumert,et al.  The development of memory for location: what role do spatial prototypes play? , 2001, Child development.

[29]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. , 1971 .

[30]  W. Schneider.  The Role of Conceptual Knowledge and Metamemory in the Development of Organizational Processes in Memory , 1986 .

[31]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[32]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Production deficiency in young children's clustered recall. , 1969 .

[33]  T. McNamara.  Mental representations of spatial relations , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Barrier effects in the cognitive maps of children and adults. , 1982, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  T. McNamara,et al.  Constraints on priming in spatial memory: Naturally learned versus experimentally learned environments , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[36]  John P. Spencer,et al.  Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. , 2002 .

[37]  Jodie M Plumert,et al.  Delay-induced bias in children's memory for location. , 2002, Child development.

[38]  K. Clayton,et al.  Contribution of temporal contiguity to the spatial priming effect. , 1991 .