Evaluation of an active variable-damping structure

Abstract : We present an evaluation of the potential improvements in seismic disturbance rejection obtained by using active variable damping control in a structure. Using the response to seismic excitation of an optimally controlled variable structure and of a minimax optimally designed fixed structure, we obtain an upper bound on the achievable performance and a lower bound on the acceptability of a control system for a variable damping structure. Our numerical experiments suggest three conclusions. (1) A minimax optimal designed structure gives very good seismic disturbance suppression, not only for the earthquakes used in its design, but also for other earthquakes of similar intensity. (2) The use of variable structure control is not likely to result in smaller maximum interstory drifts than exhibited by a fixed minimax designed structure. (3) The gap between the upper and lower bounds is rather small, which makes designing a feedback law that results in performance superior to that of a minimax designed structure very difficult. The best choice appears to be in the form of a continuous moving horizon control law, using a horizon of under 0.2 seconds. This requires determination of whether local ground motion can be predicted up to 0.2 sec. ahead, using ground motion monitoring sensors located a small distance away from the site.

[1]  I G Buckle,et al.  MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BASE ISOLATION BEARINGS FOR A BRIDGE DECK MODEL TEST , 1987 .

[2]  G. Bekey,et al.  Optimum Pulse Control of Flexible Structures , 1981 .

[3]  Earthquake risk and insurance , 1993 .

[4]  J Penzien,et al.  STRUCTURE-FOUNDATION INTERACTIONS UNDER DYNAMIC LOADS , 1984 .

[5]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Floor response spectrum method for seismic analysis of multiply supported secondary systems , 1986 .

[6]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  Design considerations for shear links in eccentrically braced frames , 1983 .

[7]  G L Fenves,et al.  RESPONSE OF THE DUMBARTON BRIDGE IN THE LOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE , 1992 .

[8]  James M. Kelly,et al.  The influence of preform on the modes of vibrating beams , 1990 .

[9]  J. S. Dimsdale System identification of structures with joint rotation , 1982 .

[10]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Response spectrum method for multi‐support seismic excitations , 1992 .

[11]  Zexiang Li,et al.  Aseismic hybrid control of nonlinear and hysteretic structures. II , 1992 .

[12]  G. H. Powell,et al.  Generalized plastic hinge concepts for 3D beam-column elements , 1981 .

[13]  羅俊雄,et al.  Preliminary Report on the Smart-1 Strong Motion Array in Taiwan , 1982 .

[14]  J Penzien,et al.  SEISMIC MODELLING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS , 1984 .

[15]  Kenzo Toki,et al.  Active Control of Seismic Response of Structures , 1990 .

[16]  K. W. Wang,et al.  Semi-active vibration control of structures via variable damping elements , 1991 .

[17]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  On-Line Parameter Control of Nonlinear Flexible Structures , 1987 .

[18]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Simplified analysis for earthquake resistant design of concrete gravity dams. , 1986 .

[19]  T. Soong,et al.  Modal Control of Multistory Structures , 1976 .

[20]  Riley M. Chung,et al.  Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations , 1985 .

[21]  Ronald W. Yeung,et al.  Response of tension‐leg platforms to vertical seismic excitations , 1988 .

[22]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Earthquake analysis and response of concrete gravity dams. , 1800 .

[23]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Structural optimization : proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Structural Optimization, Melbourne, Australia, 9-13 February 1988 , 1988 .

[24]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  A BEAM ELEMENT FOR SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[25]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Design Problems in Soil Liquefaction , 1987 .

[26]  F. J. Cambra Earthquake response considerations of broad liquid storage tanks , 1982 .

[27]  T. T. Soong,et al.  An Analysis of Pulse Control for Simple Mechanical Systems , 1984 .

[28]  E. P. Popov,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Active Beam Links in Eccentrically Braced Frames , 1983 .

[29]  Mohamed Abdel-Rohman,et al.  General Approach to Active Structural Control , 1979 .

[30]  Elijah Polak,et al.  Minimax Algorithms for Structural Optimization , 1988 .

[31]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Robust control of base-isolated structures under earthquake excitation , 1987 .

[32]  Elijah Polak,et al.  On the use of consistent approximations in the solution of semi-infinite optimization and optimal control problems , 1993, Math. Program..

[33]  Filip C. Filippou A Simple Model for Reinforcing Bar Anchorages Under Cyclic Excitations , 1985 .

[34]  N. Abrahamson Estimation of seismic wave coherency and rupture velocity using the smart 1 strong motion array recordings , 1985 .

[35]  John Roorda,et al.  Tendon Control in Tall Structures , 1975 .

[36]  Tzong-Shuoh Yang,et al.  Slotted Bolted Connection Energy Dissipators , 1993 .

[37]  E. L. Wilson New approaches for the dynamic analysis of large structural systems , 1982 .

[38]  J P Moehle,et al.  SHEAR STRENGTH AND DEFORMABILITY OF RC BRIDGE COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO INELASTIC CYCLIC DISPLACEMENTS , 1992 .

[39]  E. Polak,et al.  On the Optimal Control of Systems Described by Evolution Equations , 1994 .

[40]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  Simplified procedures for the evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking , 1987 .

[41]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analyses of Cohesionless Soils , 1986 .