Reduction of Intracellular Tension and Cell Adhesion Promotes Open Chromatin Structure and Enhances Cell Reprogramming

The role of transcription factors and biomolecules in cell type conversion has been widely studied. Yet, it remains unclear whether and how intracellular mechanotransduction through focal adhesions (FAs) and the cytoskeleton regulates the epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. Here, it is shown that cytoskeletal structures and the mechanical properties of cells are modulated during the early phase of induced neuronal (iN) reprogramming, with an increase in actin cytoskeleton assembly induced by Ascl1 transgene. The reduction of actin cytoskeletal tension or cell adhesion at the early phase of reprogramming suppresses the expression of mesenchymal genes, promotes a more open chromatin structure, and significantly enhances the efficiency of iN conversion. Specifically, reduction of intracellular tension or cell adhesion not only modulates global epigenetic marks, but also decreases DNA methylation and heterochromatin marks and increases euchromatin marks at the promoter of neuronal genes, thus enhancing the accessibility for gene activation. Finally, micro- and nano-topographic surfaces that reduce cell adhesions enhance iN reprogramming. These novel findings suggest that the actin cytoskeleton and FAs play an important role in epigenetic regulation for cell fate determination, which may lead to novel engineering approaches for cell reprogramming.

[1]  S. Dupont,et al.  Mechanical regulation of chromatin and transcription , 2022, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  P. Wong,et al.  Transient nuclear deformation primes epigenetic state and promotes cell reprogramming , 2021, bioRxiv.

[3]  Thomas M. Keane,et al.  Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools , 2020, GigaScience.

[4]  Raphael Gottardo,et al.  Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data , 2020, Cell.

[5]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Engineering Biomaterials with Micro/Nanotechnologies for Cell Reprogramming. , 2020, ACS nano.

[6]  Li Yang,et al.  Cell engineering: Biophysical regulation of the nucleus. , 2020, Biomaterials.

[7]  D. Odde,et al.  Emerging technologies in mechanotransduction research. , 2019, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[8]  Sarah R. Clippinger,et al.  Disrupted mechanobiology links the molecular and cellular phenotypes in familial dilated cardiomyopathy , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Andrew J. Hill,et al.  The single cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis , 2019, Nature.

[10]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  Material approaches to active tissue mechanics , 2018, Nature Reviews Materials.

[11]  A. Yoo,et al.  Mechanistic Insights Into MicroRNA-Induced Neuronal Reprogramming of Human Adult Fibroblasts , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  Jianping Fu,et al.  A systems mechanobiology model to predict cardiac reprogramming outcomes on different biomaterials. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[13]  A. R. Perestrelo,et al.  Cellular Mechanotransduction: From Tension to Function , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[14]  R. Treisman,et al.  Mutual dependence of the MRTF–SRF and YAP–TEAD pathways in cancer-associated fibroblasts is indirect and mediated by cytoskeletal dynamics , 2017, Genes & development.

[15]  D. Navajas,et al.  Force Triggers YAP Nuclear Entry by Regulating Transport across Nuclear Pores , 2017, Cell.

[16]  A. Hyman,et al.  Genome-scale single-cell mechanical phenotyping reveals disease-related genes involved in mitotic rounding , 2017, Nature Communications.

[17]  Caroline Uhler,et al.  Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  D. Khismatullin,et al.  Quantitative Deformability Cytometry: Rapid, Calibrated Measurements of Cell Mechanical Properties. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Nicholas A. Sinnott-Armstrong,et al.  An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues , 2017, Nature Methods.

[20]  Hannah A. Pliner,et al.  Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories , 2017, Nature Methods.

[21]  Ricky Tsang,et al.  Distinct focal adhesion protein modules control different aspects of mechanotransduction , 2017, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  Jennifer Soto,et al.  Biophysical regulation of cell reprogramming. , 2017, Current opinion in chemical engineering.

[23]  P. Kingshott,et al.  Binary colloidal crystals (BCCs) as a feeder-free system to generate human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[24]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Effect of biophysical cues on reprogramming to cardiomyocytes. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[25]  N. Neff,et al.  Dissecting direct reprogramming from fibroblast to neuron using single-cell RNA-seq , 2016, Nature.

[26]  Jin-Su Kim,et al.  Stiffness of Hydrogels Regulates Cellular Reprogramming Efficiency Through Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition and Stemness Markers. , 2016, Macromolecular bioscience.

[27]  M. Stevens,et al.  Enhanced efficiency of genetic programming toward cardiomyocyte creation through topographical cues , 2015, Biomaterials.

[28]  Xiang Li,et al.  Small-Molecule-Driven Direct Reprogramming of Mouse Fibroblasts into Functional Neurons. , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[29]  N. Gavara,et al.  Relationship between cell stiffness and stress fiber amount, assessed by simultaneous atomic force microscopy and live-cell fluorescence imaging , 2015, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[30]  Yang-Kao Wang,et al.  Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing , 2015, Oncotarget.

[31]  N. Jeon,et al.  Nanogrooved substrate promotes direct lineage reprogramming of fibroblasts to functional induced dopaminergic neurons. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[32]  Hongkui Deng,et al.  Direct lineage reprogramming: strategies, mechanisms, and applications. , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[33]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[34]  Seung Woo Jung,et al.  Generation of Induced Neuronal Cells by the Single Reprogramming Factor ASCL1 , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[35]  R. Yasuda,et al.  The effect of substrate topography on direct reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced neurons. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[36]  D. Schaffer,et al.  Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. , 2013, Nature materials.

[37]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Hierarchical Mechanisms for Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Neurons , 2013, Cell.

[38]  Wei Shi,et al.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features , 2013, Bioinform..

[39]  J. Lammerding,et al.  Lamin A/C and emerin regulate MKL1/SRF activity by modulating actin dynamics , 2013, Nature.

[40]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  A blueprint for engineering cell fate: current technologies to reprogram cell identity , 2013, Cell Research.

[41]  George Q. Daley,et al.  Reprogramming Cellular Identity for Regenerative Medicine , 2012, Cell.

[42]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[43]  T. Graf,et al.  Historical origins of transdifferentiation and reprogramming. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[44]  B. Strulovici,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells — opportunities for disease modelling and drug discovery , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[45]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors , 2011, Nature.

[46]  Marcel Martin.  Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[47]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[48]  V. Vedantham,et al.  Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Functional Cardiomyocytes by Defined Factors , 2010, Cell.

[49]  Hong Hui Wang,et al.  Blebbistatin, a myosin II inhibitor, suppresses contraction and disrupts contractile filaments organization of skinned taenia cecum from guinea pig. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[50]  Matthew D. Young,et al.  Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias , 2010, Genome Biology.

[51]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors , 2010, Nature.

[52]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton , 2010, Nature.

[53]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[54]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[55]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[56]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[57]  A. Straight,et al.  Specificity of blebbistatin, an inhibitor of myosin II , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.