Introduction. Stochastic physics and climate modelling

Finite computing resources limit the spatial resolution of state-of-the-art global climate simulations to hundreds of kilometres. In neither the atmosphere nor the ocean are small-scale processes such as convection, clouds and ocean eddies properly represented. Climate simulations are known to depend, sometimes quite strongly, on the resulting bulk-formula representation of unresolved processes. Stochastic physics schemes within weather and climate models have the potential to represent the dynamical effects of unresolved scales in ways which conventional bulk-formula representations are incapable of so doing. The application of stochastic physics to climate modelling is a rapidly advancing, important and innovative topic. The latest research findings are gathered together in the Theme Issue for which this paper serves as the introduction.

[1]  A. Weaver,et al.  Stochastic models of the meridional overturning circulation: time scales and patterns of variability , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  Richard Kleeman,et al.  Stochastic theories for the irregularity of ENSO , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[4]  D. Wilks.  Effects of stochastic parametrization on conceptual climate models , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  R. Plant,et al.  Comparison of stochastic parametrization approaches in a single-column model , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Peter Lynch,et al.  The Emergence of Numerical Weather Prediction: Richardson's Dream , 2006 .

[7]  Andrew J Majda,et al.  An applied mathematics perspective on stochastic modelling for climate , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Brian D. Ewald,et al.  On modelling physical systems with stochastic models: diffusion versus Lévy processes , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  B. Nadiga.  Orientation of eddy fluxes in geostrophic turbulence , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  C. E. Puente,et al.  The Essence of Chaos , 1995 .

[11]  L. Frankcombe,et al.  A stochastic dynamical systems view of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  J Berner,et al.  Impact of a quasi-stochastic cellular automaton backscatter scheme on the systematic error and seasonal prediction skill of a global climate model , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  T. Palmer.  A nonlinear dynamical perspective on model error: A proposal for non‐local stochastic‐dynamic parametrization in weather and climate prediction models , 2001 .

[14]  G. Shutts,et al.  Stochastic parametrization of multiscale processes using a dual-grid approach , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  J. Neelin,et al.  Rethinking convective quasi-equilibrium: observational constraints for stochastic convective schemes in climate models , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.