Climate Change and Local Host Availability Drive the Northern Range Boundary in the Rapid Expansion of a Specialist Insect Herbivore, Papilio cresphontes

Species distributions, abundance, and interactions have always been influenced by human activity and are currently experiencing rapid change. Biodiversity benchmark surveys traditionally require intense human labor inputs to find, identify, and record organisms limiting the rate and impact of scientific enquiry and discovery. Recent emergence and advancement of monitoring technologies have improved biodiversity data collection to a scale and scope previously unimaginable. Community science web platforms, smartphone applications, and technology assisted identification have expedited the speed and enhanced the volume of observational data all while providing open access to these data worldwide. How to integrate and leverage the data into valuable information on how species are changing in space and time requires new best practices in computational and analytical approaches. Here we integrate data from three community science repositories to explore how a specialist herbivore distribution changes in relation to host plant distributions and other environmental factors. We generate a series of temporally explicit species distribution models to generate range predictions for a specialist insect herbivore (Papilio cresphontes) and three predominant host-plant species. We find that this insect species has experienced rapid northern range expansion, likely due to a combination of the range of its larval host plants and climate changes in winter. This case study shows rapid data collection through large scale community science endeavors can be leveraged through thoughtful data integration and transparent analytic pipelines to inform how environmental change impacts where species are and their interactions for a more cost effective method of biodiversity benchmarking.

[1]  Huijie Qiao,et al.  Doubling demands in programming skills call for ecoinformatics education , 2020 .

[2]  J. Kerr,et al.  Climate change and local host availability drive the northern range boundary in the rapid northward expansion of the eastern giant swallowtail butterfly , 2019, bioRxiv.

[3]  Leona K. Svancara,et al.  Modeling Current and Future Potential Distributions of Milkweeds and the Monarch Butterfly in Idaho , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[4]  Joseph D. Engler,et al.  Host Plants and Climate Structure Habitat Associations of the Western Monarch Butterfly , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[5]  K. Wyckhuys,et al.  Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[6]  Jane Elith,et al.  blockCV: an R package for generating spatially or environmentally separated folds for k-fold cross-validation of species distribution models , 2018, bioRxiv.

[7]  F. X. Palacio,et al.  Biotic interactions in species distribution models enhance model performance and shed light on natural history of rare birds: a case study using the straight-billed reedhaunterLimnoctites rectirostris , 2018, Journal of Avian Biology.

[8]  Erin M. Schliep,et al.  Asymmetric biotic interactions and abiotic niche differences revealed by a dynamic joint species distribution model. , 2018, Ecology.

[9]  P. Calanca,et al.  Pest management under climate change: The importance of understanding tritrophic relations. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  J. Abatzoglou,et al.  TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015 , 2018, Scientific Data.

[11]  Stephen E. Fick,et al.  WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas , 2017 .

[12]  Jane E. Ogilvie,et al.  Multitrophic interactions mediate the effects of climate change on herbivore abundance , 2017, Oecologia.

[13]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Competition and facilitation may lead to asymmetric range shift dynamics with climate change , 2017, Global change biology.

[14]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent , 2017 .

[15]  J. Kerr,et al.  eButterfly: Leveraging Massive Online Citizen Science for Butterfly Conservation , 2017, Insects.

[16]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint) , 2016, bioRxiv.

[17]  E. Cook,et al.  Climatic history of the northeastern United States during the past 3000 years , 2016 .

[18]  Narkis S. Morales,et al.  MaxEnt’s parameter configuration and small samples: are we paying attention to recommendations? A systematic review , 2016, bioRxiv.

[19]  V. Zverev,et al.  Factors affecting population dynamics of leaf beetles in a subarctic region: The interplay between climate warming and pollution decline. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change , 2016, Science.

[21]  A. Guisan,et al.  Simulated shifts in trophic niche breadth modulate range loss of alpine butterflies under climate change , 2016 .

[22]  Camille Parmesan,et al.  Ecological and methodological drivers of species ' distribution and phenology responses to climate change , 2015 .

[23]  Ted Hart,et al.  Interface to Species Occurrence Data Sources , 2016 .

[24]  S. Nylin,et al.  Species range expansion constrains the ecological niches of resident butterflies , 2015, bioRxiv.

[25]  J. Kerr,et al.  Facilitating climate‐change‐induced range shifts across continental land‐use barriers , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  Allison M. Louthan,et al.  Where and When do Species Interactions Set Range Limits? , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  S. K. Schmidt,et al.  Incorporating biotic factors in species distribution modeling: are interactions with soil microbes important? , 2015 .

[28]  Paul Galpern,et al.  Climate change impacts on bumblebees converge across continents , 2015, Science.

[29]  C. Nicholls,et al.  Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[30]  N. Lemoine Climate Change May Alter Breeding Ground Distributions of Eastern Migratory Monarchs (Danaus plexippus) via Range Expansion of Asclepias Host Plants , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  Robert A. Boria,et al.  ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models , 2014 .

[32]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation , 2014 .

[33]  R. Bonney,et al.  Next Steps for Citizen Science , 2014, Science.

[34]  L. Krometis,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Waterborne Microorganisms: Implications for EU and U.S. Water Policy , 2014 .

[35]  Valentin Amrhein,et al.  Plants, Birds and Butterflies: Short-Term Responses of Species Communities to Climate Warming Vary by Taxon and with Altitude , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Global imprint of climate change on marine life , 2013 .

[37]  Elinore J. Theobald,et al.  How will biotic interactions influence climate change–induced range shifts? , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[38]  S. Finnegan,et al.  Climate Change and the Past, Present, and Future of Biotic Interactions , 2013, Science.

[39]  R. Buckley,et al.  Conservation Science and Practice , 2013 .

[40]  Shawn J. Leroux,et al.  Mechanistic models for the spatial spread of species under climate change. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[41]  M. Leishman,et al.  Species loss and gain in communities under future climate change: consequences for functional diversity , 2013 .

[42]  Greg A. Breed,et al.  Climate-driven changes in northeastern US butterfly communities , 2013 .

[43]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[44]  P. Tiffin,et al.  Role of climate and competitors in limiting fitness across range edges of an annual plant. , 2012, Ecology.

[45]  V. Eckhart,et al.  Reduced pollinator service and elevated pollen limitation at the geographic range limit of an annual plant. , 2012, Ecology.

[46]  M. Aizen,et al.  Erosion of a pollination mutualism along an environmental gradient in a south Andean treelet, Embothrium coccineum (Proteaceae) , 2012 .

[47]  S. Josey Climate change impacts , 2012 .

[48]  J. Kingsolver,et al.  Complex life cycles and the responses of insects to climate change. , 2011, Integrative and comparative biology.

[49]  R. D. Reed,et al.  The Role of Environmental Factors in the Northeastern Range Expansion of Papilio cresphontes Cramer (Papilionidae) , 2011 .

[50]  Kirk M. Stueve,et al.  Spatial variability of biotic and abiotic tree establishment constraints across a treeline ecotone in the Alaska range. , 2011, Ecology.

[51]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists , 2011 .

[52]  Jun Yu,et al.  Modeling Experts and Novices in Citizen Science Data for Species Distribution Modeling , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[53]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[54]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Experimental evidence for herbivore limitation of the treeline. , 2010, Ecology.

[55]  M. Kéry,et al.  Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site‐occupancy models , 2010 .

[56]  A. Roques,et al.  Direct impacts of recent climate warming on insect populations. , 2010, Integrative zoology.

[57]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[58]  Brian L. Sullivan,et al.  eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences , 2009 .

[59]  Patrick J. McIntyre,et al.  Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits , 2009 .

[60]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Why tropical forest lizards are vulnerable to climate warming , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  M. Luoto,et al.  Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies , 2009 .

[62]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[63]  A. Peterson,et al.  Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models , 2008 .

[64]  F. Rahel,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Invasive Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[65]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Miroslav Dudík,et al.  Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation , 2008 .

[67]  R. Real,et al.  AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models , 2008 .

[68]  R. Shine,et al.  The cane toad's (Chaunus [Bufo] marinus) increasing ability to invade Australia is revealed by a dynamically updated range model , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  M. Rietkerk,et al.  High solar radiation hinders tree regeneration above the alpine treeline in northern Ecuador , 2007, Plant Ecology.

[70]  J. Losey,et al.  The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects , 2006 .

[71]  D. Roy,et al.  The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards , 2006 .

[72]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[73]  Andrea Battisti,et al.  EXPANSION OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE IN THE PINE PROCESSIONARY MOTH CAUSED BY INCREASED WINTER TEMPERATURES , 2005 .

[74]  T. Dawson,et al.  Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions , 2005 .

[75]  E. Pollard,et al.  Fluctuations in resource availability and insect populations , 1981, Oecologia.

[76]  C. Neefus,et al.  Flowering phenology and compensation for herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata , 2003, Oecologia.

[77]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[78]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  On the evolutionary ecology of species' ranges , 2003 .

[79]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores , 2002 .

[80]  Ian P. Woiwod,et al.  Climate change impacts on insect management and conservation in temperate regions: can they be predicted? , 2001 .

[81]  J. K. Hill,et al.  Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change , 2001, Nature.

[82]  J. O H N,et al.  Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores , 2001 .

[83]  M. Ayres,et al.  Host-driven population dynamics in an herbivorous insect. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  C. Parmesan,et al.  Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming , 1999, Nature.

[85]  R. Cannon The implications of predicted climate change for insect pests in the UK, with emphasis on non‐indigenous species , 1998 .

[86]  J. H. Porter,et al.  The potential effects of climatic change on agricultural insect pests , 1991 .

[87]  J. Thompson VARIATION IN PREFERENCE AND SPECIFICITY IN MONOPHAGOUS AND OLIGOPHAGOUS SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLIES , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[88]  D. Pearson,et al.  Evidence for food as a limiting resource in the life cycle of tiger beetles ( Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). , 1985 .

[89]  J. Connell The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[90]  L. O. Howard,et al.  The Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada , 2010 .

[91]  H. J. Elwes The Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada , 1888, Nature.