Stepped Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for B2 and B3 Glenoid Pathology

Background: Posterior glenoid bone loss is commonly associated with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Surgical management of bone loss in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) remains controversial. We studied the use of a stepped augmented glenoid component for management of Walch B2 and B3 glenoids and compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up with those achieved with a non-augmented component of the same design in Walch A1 glenoids. Methods: Ninety-two patients (42 A1, 29 B2, and 21 B3 glenoids) were prospectively followed after aTSA. Sequential 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed preoperatively, within 3 months postoperatively with metal artifact reduction (MAR) to define implant position, and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively with MAR. Scapular 3D registration with implant registration allowed 3D measurement of glenoid implant position, implant shift, and central peg osteolysis (CPO). Results: CPO with or without implant shift occurred in a higher percentage of B3 glenoids treated with the augmented glenoid component (29%) than A1 glenoids treated with a standard component (5%) (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in the frequency of CPO between B2 glenoids with the augmented component (10%) and A1 glenoids with the standard component. There was no difference in postoperative glenoid component version and inclination between groups. B3 glenoids were associated with more component medialization relative to the premorbid joint line compared with A1 and B2 glenoids (p < 0.001). Conclusions: A stepped augmented glenoid component can restore premorbid glenoid anatomy in patients with asymmetric biconcave glenoid bone loss (Walch B2), with short-term clinical and radiographic results equivalent to those for patients without glenoid bone loss (Walch A1) treated with a non-augmented component. There is a greater risk of CPO in patients with moderate-to-severe B3 glenoid pathology with this stepped augmented glenoid component. Longer follow-up will help define the clinical implications of CPO over time. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  Jason C. Ho,et al.  Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty , 2021, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of Pathologic Correction in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Based on Severity of Preoperative Pathology. , 2020, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  I. Jonkers,et al.  Automated quantification of glenoid bone defects using 3-dimensional measurements. , 2020, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty , 2019, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Jason C. Ho,et al.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Posteriorly Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis with Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  O. Verborgt,et al.  Can the contralateral scapula be used as a reliable template to reconstruct the eroded scapula during shoulder arthroplasty? , 2018, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  Jason C. Ho,et al.  The Association Between Rotator Cuff Muscle Fatty Infiltration and Glenoid Morphology in Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Progression of Glenoid Morphology in Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Quantitative Measurement of Osseous Pathology in Advanced Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis , 2017, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  M. Wirth,et al.  Radiographic results of augmented all-polyethylene glenoids in the presence of posterior glenoid bone loss during total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2017, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  P. Favorito,et al.  Total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis associated with posterior glenoid bone loss: results of an all-polyethylene, posteriorly augmented glenoid component. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[12]  G. Walch,et al.  A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  A. Youderian,et al.  Sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis of implant position following total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  T. Wright,et al.  Preliminary Results of a Posterior Augmented Glenoid Compared to an all Polyethylene Standard Glenoid in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. , 2015, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases.

[15]  Joseph P. Iannotti,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Vani Sabesan,et al.  Correction of acquired glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  A. Youderian,et al.  Determination of humeral head size in anatomic shoulder replacement for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  V. Sabesan,et al.  Guidelines for the selection of optimal glenoid augment size for moderate to severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[19]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Liftoff resistance of augmented glenoid components during cyclic fatigue loading in the posterior-superior direction. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  G. Walch,et al.  Current concepts in the surgical management of primary glenohumeral arthritis with a biconcave glenoid. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  J. Bryan,et al.  Development and validation of a new method of 3-dimensional assessment of glenoid and humeral component position after total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  Jason C. Ho,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of postoperative radiographic measurements of glenoid anatomy and relationships in patients with total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[23]  P. Raiss,et al.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients with a biconcave glenoid. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  Jason C. Ho,et al.  Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Is Premorbid Glenoid Anatomy Altered in Patients with Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis? , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  J. Bryan,et al.  Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  Gilles Walch,et al.  Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[28]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Predicting normal glenoid version from the pathologic scapula: a comparison of 4 methods in 2- and 3-dimensional models. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[29]  J. Bryan,et al.  The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  J. Bryan,et al.  The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[31]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[32]  J. Bryan,et al.  Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional computed tomography scans. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[33]  J. Iannotti,et al.  The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity. , 2006, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[34]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  G. Walch,et al.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[36]  Ilse Jonkers,et al.  Virtual reconstruction of glenoid bone defects using a statistical shape model. , 2018, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[37]  Kimerly A Powell,et al.  Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[38]  F. Sim,et al.  THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS* , 2000 .

[39]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..