Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

A major issue in speech production research is the question of how speakers retrieve words from the so-called mental lexicon. Current models of lexical retrieval converge on the assumption that category associates of a target word are semantically activated during speech planning. However, the question of whether these competitors are also phonologically activated is less agreed on. Past research has addressed this issue by testing whether lexical retrieval of a picture name (e.g. sheep) affects, or is affected by, the processing of a word that is phonologically related to a semantic category associate to the picture name (e.g. goal, phonologically related to goat). Behavioral studies have failed to obtain such so-called mediated priming effects, but have been questioned on the grounds of possibly insufficient task sensitivity. As such priming effects have reliably been obtained with event-related brain potentials in word recognition, we used this approach for testing these effects in lexical retrieval during speech planning. Our results consistently demonstrate the absence of mediated priming effects, putting strong constraints on the activation flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning.

[1]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Exploring the Activation of Semantic and Phonological Codes during Speech Planning with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[3]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[4]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Cross-modal semantic priming: A time-course analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1993 .

[6]  W. Levelt Models of word production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  W. Levelt,et al.  Lexical access in the production of pronouns , 1999, Cognition.

[9]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. , 1997 .

[10]  R. R. Peterson,et al.  Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .

[11]  M. Garrett Processes in language production , 1988 .

[12]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Analysis of the Time Course of Conceptual and Syntactic Encoding during Tacit Picture Naming , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production : Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms , 1998 .

[14]  M Turennout,et al.  Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. , 1998, Science.

[15]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Phonological effects on the auditory N400 event-related brain potential. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[17]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Strictly discrete serial stages and contextual appropriateness , 1999 .

[18]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[19]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[20]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.

[21]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production , 1993 .

[22]  M. Besson,et al.  Semantic, repetition and rime priming between spoken words: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 1998, Biological Psychology.

[23]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Neurophysiological Manifestations of Phonological Processing: Latency Variation of a Negative ERP Component Timelocked to Phonological Mismatch , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[25]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  H. Kolk,et al.  Mediated Priming in the Lexical Decision Task: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials and Reaction Time , 2000 .

[27]  G. Dell,et al.  Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: a comment on Levelt et al. (1991). , 1991, Psychological review.

[28]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. , 2001, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[31]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[33]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[34]  Padraig G. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Mediated Semantic-Phonological Priming: Calling Distant Relatives , 1997 .