An inertial two-phase model of wax transport in a pipeline during pigging operations

Pig in pipelines performs operations for cleaning the pipe interior and internal inspection. In the past few years many 1D models have been developed to simulate the process because of their reduced computational cost; however, they rely on simplifications which are not always valid. In this paper, the results of a three-dimensional (3D) numerical investigation of the interaction between a waxy-oil and a dynamic sealing pig in a pipeline are presented. The results are obtained at a reduced computational cost by using a moving frame of reference, and an “injection” boundary condition for the wax deposited on the wall. The effect of the temperature and the wax particles’ size has been investigated. The 3D results show the structure assumed by the debris field in front of the pig. In particular, a lubrication region at the bottom of the pipe, whose dimensions are temperature dependent, is shown. This information cannot be deduced from 1D modeling. The influence of the oil on the mixture viscosity and the internal bed dynamics are discussed. This work provides insights into the interaction between the debris field in front of the pig and pipeline hydraulics.

[1]  Settling velocity of sediments at high concentrations , 2004 .

[2]  A. Boghi,et al.  Phase-field modelling of a miscible system in spinning droplet tensiometer. , 2016, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Numerical scheme for accurately capturing gas migration described by 1D multiphase drift flux model , 2015 .

[4]  Qiyu Huang,et al.  Prediction for wax deposition in oil pipelines validated by field pigging , 2014 .

[5]  Sergey Gavrilyuk,et al.  Lagrangian coordinates for a drift-flux model of a gas-liquid mixture , 1996 .

[6]  Yuri V. Fairuzov,et al.  Modeling of Transient Two-Phase Flow in a Well After Startup of Electrical Submersible Pump , 2002 .

[7]  Jing Gong,et al.  Pigging simulation for horizontal gas-condensate pipelines with low-liquid loading , 2005 .

[8]  K. Sepehrnoori,et al.  Experimental Study on Mechanisms of Wax Removal During Pipeline Pigging , 2015 .

[9]  A. Patrachari,et al.  A conceptual framework to model interfacial contamination in multiproduct petroleum pipelines , 2012 .

[10]  M. Ishii,et al.  One-dimensional drift-flux model for two-phase flow in pool rod bundle systems , 2012 .

[11]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  Pigging dynamics in two-phase flow pipelines: Experiment and modeling , 1995 .

[12]  Sang Bong Kim,et al.  Speed control of PIG using bypass flow in natural gas pipeline , 2001, ISIE 2001. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8570).

[13]  Qian Wang,et al.  An Experimental Study on Mechanics of Wax Removal in Pipeline , 2005 .

[14]  H. Åsheim,et al.  Holdup Propagation Predicted by Steady-state Drift Flux Models , 1998 .

[15]  Dariush Mowla,et al.  Mathematical modeling and simulation of pigging operation in gas and liquid pipelines , 2009 .

[16]  P.C.R. Lima,et al.  Application of low density foam pigs offshore Brazil , 1995 .

[17]  Jonathan Southgate Wax removal using pipeline pigs , 2004 .

[18]  Q. Xue,et al.  Tribological Properties of Si-Doped Graphite-Like Amorphous Carbon Film of PEEK Rubbing with Different Counterparts in SBF Medium , 2015, Tribology Letters.

[19]  Tan Tien Nguyen,et al.  Modeling and simulation for PIG flow control in natural gas Pipeline , 2001 .

[20]  Qian Wang,et al.  An Experimental Study on Wax Removal in Pipes With Oil Flow , 2008 .

[21]  Angela O. Nieckele,et al.  Transient Pig Motion Through Gas and Liquid Pipelines , 2001 .

[22]  Robert Parry,et al.  Exhibition , 2007, Microprocess. Microsystems.

[23]  Numerical evidence of an undisturbed region of flow in a turbulent rectangular submerged free jet , 2016 .

[24]  Si-wei Zhang,et al.  Spatio-temporal structure in wax–oil gel scraping at a soft tribological contact , 2015 .

[25]  Sang Bong Kim,et al.  Verification of the Theoretical Model for Analyzing Dynamic Behavior of the PIG from Actual Pigging , 2003 .

[26]  Alvis E. McDonald,et al.  A Method of Calculating Multiphase Flow in Pipe Lines Using Rubber Spheres to Control Liquid Holdup , 1964 .

[27]  Seyed Mostafa Hosseinalipour,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Pig Motion through Gas Pipelines , 2007 .

[28]  L. F. A. Azevedo,et al.  Resistive Force of Wax Deposits During Pigging Operations , 1999 .

[30]  Richard T. Lahey,et al.  The use of drift-flux techniques for the analysis of horizontal two-phase flows , 1992 .

[31]  B. Camenen Chapter 15 Settling velocity of sediments at high concentrations , 2008 .

[33]  S. A. Al-Nassri,et al.  Developing laminar flow in the inlet length of a smooth pipe , 1981 .

[34]  Si-wei Zhang,et al.  Tribological Behaviours of Wax-in-Oil Gel Deposition in Orthogonal Cleaning Process , 2015, Tribology Letters.

[35]  Matteo Angelino,et al.  Preliminary numerical solutions of the evolution of free jets. IMECE2012-86730 , 2012 .

[36]  Mansour Rafeeyan,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Small Pig through Two and Three- Dimensional Liquid Pipeline , 2012 .

[37]  M. Mirshamsi Dynamic Analysis of Pig through Two and Three Dimensional Gas Pipeline , 2014 .

[38]  Tan Tien Nguyen,et al.  Dynamic modeling and its analysis for PIG flow through curved section in natural gas pipeline , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01EX515).

[39]  Deguo Wang,et al.  Probing tribological properties of waxy oil in pipeline pigging with fluorescence technique , 2014 .

[40]  Afshin J. Ghajar,et al.  A flow pattern independent drift flux model based void fraction correlation for a wide range of gas–liquid two phase flow , 2014 .

[41]  Saeed Ziaei-Rad,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Small Pigs in Space Pipelines , 2009 .

[42]  Zheng Hu,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of a novel self-drive pipeline pig , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[43]  M. Angelino,et al.  Numerical solution of three-dimensional rectangular submerged jets with the evidence of the undisturbed region of flow , 2016 .

[45]  F. Gori,et al.  Passive scalar diffusion in the near field region of turbulent rectangular submerged free jets , 2017 .

[46]  M.K.S. Sastry,et al.  Wax formation in oil pipelines: A critical review , 2011 .

[47]  A. O. Nieckele,et al.  DESIGN AND CONTROL OF PIG OPERATIONS THROUGH PIPELINES , 2008 .

[48]  P.C.R. Lima,et al.  Modeling of Pigging Operations , 1999 .

[49]  Tan Tien Nguyen,et al.  Modeling and simulation for PIG with bypass flow control in natural gas pipeline , 2001 .

[50]  Ole Morten Aamo,et al.  A simplified two-phase flow model using a quasi-equilibrium momentum balance , 2016 .

[51]  Qiyu Huang,et al.  A Pigging Model for Wax Removal in Pipes , 2016 .

[52]  H. Rusche Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions , 2003 .

[53]  A. O. Nieckele,et al.  Simple HydrodynamicModels for the Prediction of Pig Motions in Pipelines , 1996 .

[54]  Hoi Yeung,et al.  Modelling of Transient Two-Phase Flow Operations and Offshore Pigging , 1998 .

[56]  M. Angelino,et al.  Numerical evidence of an undisturbed region of flow in a turbulent rectangular submerged free jet , 2016 .

[57]  Tom E. Baldock,et al.  Settling velocity of sediments at high concentrations , 2004 .