Individual Targeting Increases Control Over Inter-Individual Variability in Simulated Transcranial Electric Fields

Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) induces electric fields that propagate in the brain and depend on individual anatomies. The interaction between the electric fields and individual anatomies may contribute to the heterogenous results that are commonly observed across tES studies in humans. Targeted tES is able to account for some of these individual factors by adapting the electric field to the stimulation target. Here, the effect of individually targeted tES on simulated intracranial electric fields was evaluated in head models of twenty-one participants using the finite-element method (FEM). For all participants, two individually targeted tES montages were compared to a fixed stimulation montage that was not individually optimized. For a simulated parietal stimulation target with three different orientations, individual current densities showed varying intensities near the lower limit at which physiological efficacy of electric fields can be assumed. However, targeting algorithms were able to control different electric field properties, by either maximizing the target current densities or by increasing the specificity of electric fields with respect to target location and orientation. Electric fields were constrained by individual anatomical properties, but still showed considerable variation for the given parietal stimulation target across participants. Thus, we present findings of inter-individual variability within the same cortical region to complement recent studies that showed large variation across cortical regions in a single FEM head model. Our results support the usage of individual targeting for enhancing the efficacy of tES and for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of tES. At the same time, residual variability in electric fields is suggested to be utilized for the explanation of individual differences in the tES outcome.

[1]  Yu Huang,et al.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur,et al.  A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016) , 2016, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  Prospects for transcranial temporal interference stimulation in humans: a computational study , 2019 .

[4]  L. Parra,et al.  Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Yu Huang,et al.  Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke , 2013, NeuroImage.

[7]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[8]  Heleen A. Slagter,et al.  No Differential Effects of Two Different Alpha-Band Electrical Stimulation Protocols Over Fronto-Parietal Regions on Spatial Attention , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[9]  B. Cheeran,et al.  Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  S. Schiff,et al.  Sensitivity of Neurons to Weak Electric Fields , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Andreas Galka,et al.  Combining EEG and MEG for the Reconstruction of Epileptic Activity Using a Calibrated Realistic Volume Conductor Model , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Optimal use of EEG recordings to target active brain areas with transcranial electrical stimulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[14]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  Geometry-Adapted Hexahedral Meshes Improve Accuracy of Finite-Element-Method-Based EEG Source Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  O. Carter,et al.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[16]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms , 2016, Neural plasticity.

[17]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. , 1962, Experimental neurology.

[19]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  Advanced Boundary Electrode Modeling for tES and Parallel tES/EEG , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  G. Thut,et al.  Inconsistent Effects of Parietal α-tACS on Pseudoneglect across Two Experiments: A Failed Internal Replication , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[21]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art , 2018, NeuroImage.

[23]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Human in-vivo brain magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) , 2018, NeuroImage.

[24]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Dose-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on spike timing in awake nonhuman primates , 2019, Science Advances.

[25]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[26]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[27]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Lasting EEG/MEG Aftereffects of Rhythmic Transcranial Brain Stimulation: Level of Control Over Oscillatory Network Activity , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[28]  M. Bikson,et al.  Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Martin Burger,et al.  An Optimization Approach for Well-Targeted Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2015, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[31]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Spatial Attention and the Effects of Frontoparietal Alpha Band Stimulation , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[32]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields , 2014, NeuroImage.

[35]  O. Carter,et al.  Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[37]  L. Parra,et al.  Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[39]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[40]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  Accessibility of cortical regions to focal TES: Dependence on spatial position, safety, and practical constraints , 2019, NeuroImage.

[41]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[42]  L. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[43]  L. Parra,et al.  Can transcranial electric stimulation with multiple electrodes reach deep targets? , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  Kohitij Kar,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[47]  Matthew R. Krause,et al.  Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[49]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Peter T Fox,et al.  Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[51]  Martin Burger,et al.  Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem , 2016, NeuroImage.

[52]  Stefano Masiero,et al.  Personalized transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and physical therapy to treat motor and cognitive symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A randomized cross-over trial , 2019, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[53]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  Constrained maximum intensity optimized multi-electrode tDCS targeting of human somatosensory network , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[54]  J. Deans,et al.  Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  Ursula van Rienen,et al.  Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[56]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[57]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[58]  T. R. Knösche,et al.  Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study , 2017, Brain Topography.

[59]  Jérémie Lefebvre,et al.  Modulation of Cortical Oscillations by Low-Frequency Direct Cortical Stimulation Is State-Dependent , 2016, PLoS biology.

[60]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  A Discontinuous Galerkin Method to Solve the EEG Forward Problem Using the Subtraction Approach , 2015, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[61]  L. Parra,et al.  Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[62]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[63]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  Integrating electric field modeling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects , 2019, Nature Communications.

[64]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  PET-Based Confirmation of Orientation Sensitivity of TMS-Induced Cortical Activation in Humans , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[65]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[66]  Roy H. Hamilton,et al.  Individualized treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to stroke , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[67]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[68]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models. , 2011, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[69]  L. Parra,et al.  Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings , 2017, Nature Communications.

[70]  Dennis J. L. G. Schutter,et al.  A meta-analytic study of exogenous oscillatory electric potentials in neuroenhancement , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  A Mixed Finite Element Method to Solve the EEG Forward Problem , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[72]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Head models of healthy and depressed adults for simulating the electric fields of non-invasive electric brain stimulation , 2018, F1000Research.

[73]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS , 2013, NeuroImage.

[74]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper , 2017, Clinical Neurophysiology.