Bare Tethers for Electrodynamic Spacecraft Propulsion

Electrodynamic tether thrusters can use the power provided by solar panels to drive a current in the tether and then the Lorentz force to push against the Earth's magnetic field, thereby achieving propulsion without the expenditure of onboard energy sources or propellant. Practical tether propulsion depends critically on being able to extract multiamp electron currents from the ionosphere with relatively short tethers (10 km or less) and reasonably low power. We describe a new anodic design that uses an uninsulated portion of the metallic tether itself to collect electrons. Because of the efficient collection of this type of anode, electrodynamic thrusters for reboost of the International Space Station and for an upper stage capable of orbit raising, lowering, and inclination changes appear to be feasible. Specifically, a 10-km-long bare tether, utilizing 10 kW of the space station power could save most of the propellant required for the station reboost over its 10-year lifetime. The propulsive small expendable deployer system experiment is planned to test the bare-tether design in space in the year 2000 by deploying a 5-km bare aluminum tether from a Delta II upper stage to achieve up to 0.5-N drag thrust, thus deorbiting the stage.

[1]  R. D. Estes,et al.  The orbital-motion-limited regime of cylindrical Langmuir probes , 1999 .

[2]  R. D. Estes,et al.  Performance of Bare-Tether Systems Under Varying Magnetic and Plasma Conditions , 2000 .

[3]  Eduardo Ahedo,et al.  Bare wire anodes for electrodynamic tethers , 1993 .

[4]  Brian L. Murphy,et al.  Potential buildup on an electron-emitting ionospheric satellite , 1967 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  The current‐voltage characteristics of a large probe in low Earth orbit: TSS‐1R results , 1998 .

[6]  Francis F. Chen,et al.  Measurement of Low Plasma Densities in a Magnetic Field , 1968 .

[7]  R. D. Estes,et al.  Cylindrical Langmuir probes beyond the orbital-motion-limited regime , 2000 .

[8]  Tamer M. Wasfy,et al.  Dynamic simulation of a tethered satellite system using finite elements and fuzzy sets , 2001 .

[9]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Enhanced electrodynamic tether currents due to electron emission from a neutral gas discharge: Results from the TSS‐1R Mission , 1998 .

[10]  N. Miller Some implications of satellite spin effects in cylindrical probe measurements. , 1972 .

[11]  Juan Ramón Sanmartín Losada,et al.  Short, high current electrodynamic tether , 1994 .

[12]  Les Johnson,et al.  Propulsive Small Expendable Deployer System (ProSEDS) space experiment , 1998 .

[13]  Peter Z. Takacs,et al.  Magnetosheath effects on cylindrical Langmuir probes , 1979 .

[14]  Enrico C. Lorenzini In-Space Transportation with Tethers , 1999 .

[15]  C. C. Rupp,et al.  Control and flight performance of tethered satellite small expendable deployment system-II , 1996 .

[16]  Kenell J. Touryan,et al.  Electric probes in stationary and flowing plasmas: theory and application , 1975 .

[17]  J. G. Laframboise Current collection by a positively charged spacecraft: Effects of its magnetic presheath , 1997 .

[18]  S. H. Lam,et al.  Unified Theory for the Langmuir Probe in a Collisionless Plasma , 1965 .

[19]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  Current‐voltage characteristics of the TSS 1 satellite , 1995 .

[20]  M. Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Spacecraft Electric Propulsion—An Overview , 1998 .

[21]  Kenell J. Touryan,et al.  Electric Probes in Stationary and Flowing Plasmas , 1975 .

[22]  L. W. Parker,et al.  Probe design for orbit‐limited current collection , 1973 .

[23]  Ira Katz,et al.  TSS‐1R electron currents: Magnetic limited collection from a heated presheath , 1998 .