The New Potential for Understanding Groundwater Contaminant Transport

: The groundwater remediation field has been changing constantly since it first emerged in the 1970s. The remediation field has evolved from a dissolved-phase centric conceptual model to a DNAPL-dominated one, which is now being questioned due to a renewed appreciation of matrix diffusion effects on remediation. Detailed observations about contaminant transport have emerged from the remediation field, and challenge the validity of one of the mainstays of the groundwater solute transport modeling world: the concept of mechanical dispersion (Payne et al. 2008). We review and discuss how a new conceptual model of contaminant transport based on diffusion (the usurper) may topple the well-established position of mechanical dispersion (the status quo) that is commonly used in almost every groundwater contaminant transport model, and evaluate the status of existing models and modeling studies that were conducted using advection-dispersion models.

[1]  F. Molz,et al.  An Examination of Scale-Dependent Dispersion Coefficients , 1983 .

[2]  E. Sudicky,et al.  An Advection‐Diffusion Concept for Solute Transport in Heterogeneous Unconsolidated Geological Deposits , 1984 .

[3]  F. Molz,et al.  An Analysis of Dispersion in a Stratified Aquifer , 1984 .

[4]  F. Molz,et al.  A Simplified Analysis of Two‐Well Tracer Tests in Stratified Aquifers , 1986 .

[5]  F. Molz,et al.  Internal inconsistencies in dispersion-dominated models that incorporate chemical and microbial kinetics , 1988 .

[6]  F. Molz,et al.  Implications of Observed and Simulated Ambient Flow in Monitoring Wells , 2001, Ground water.

[7]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  When good statistical models of aquifer heterogeneity go bad: A comparison of flow, dispersion, and mass transfer in connected and multivariate Gaussian hydraulic conductivity fields , 2003 .

[8]  Harihar Rajaram,et al.  Stochastic fractal‐based models of heterogeneity in subsurface hydrology: Origins, applications, limitations, and future research questions , 2004 .

[9]  Heidi Christiansen Barlebo,et al.  Investigating the Macrodispersion Experiment (MADE) site in Columbus, Mississippi, using a three‐dimensional inverse flow and transport model , 2004 .

[10]  H. C. Barlebo,et al.  Comment on: Investigating the Macrodispersion Experiment (MADE) site in Columbus, Mississippi, using a three-dimensional inverse flow and transport model by Heidi Christiansen Barlebo et al., Authors' reply , 2006 .

[11]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Comment on “Investigating the Macrodispersion Experiment (MADE) site in Columbus, Mississippi, using a three-dimensional inverse flow and transport model” by Heidi Christiansen Barlebo, Mary C. Hill, and Dan Rosbjerg , 2006 .

[12]  J. Jacobs.  Remediation Hydraulics , 2009 .

[13]  Marco Bianchi,et al.  Lessons Learned from 25 Years of Research at the MADE Site , 2011, Ground water.

[14]  L. Konikow.  The Secret to Successful Solute‐Transport Modeling , 2011, Ground water.

[15]  Carmen A Lebron,et al.  SERDP and ESTCP Workshop on Long Term Management of Contaminated Groundwater Sites , 2013 .