Flow in rock fractures: The local cubic law assumption reexamined

We investigate the validity of applying the “local cubic law” (LCL) to flow in a fracture bounded by impermeable rock surfaces. A two-dimensional order-of-magnitude analysis of the Navier-Stokes equations yields three conditions for the applicability of LCL flow, as a leading-order approximation in a local fracture segment with parallel or nonparallel walls. These conditions demonstrate that the “cubic law” aperture should not be measured on a point-by-point basis but rather as an average over a certain length. Extending to the third dimension, in addition to defining apertures over segment lengths, we find that the geometry of the contact regions influences flow paths more significantly than might be expected from consideration of only the nominal area fraction of these contacts. Moreover, this latter effect is enhanced by the presence of non-LCL regions around these contacts. While contact ratios of 0.1–0.2 are usually assumed to have a negligible effect, our calculations suggest that contact ratios as low as 0.03–0.05 can be significant. Analysis of computer-generated fractures with self-affine walls demonstrates a nonlinear increase in contact area and a faster-than-cubic decrease in the overall hydraulic conductivity, with decreasing fracture aperture; these results are in accordance with existing experimental data on flow in fractures. Finally, our analysis of fractures with self-affine walls indicates that the aperture distribution is not lognormal or gamma as is frequently assumed but rather truncated-normal initially and increasingly skewed with fracture closure.

[1]  Eva Hakami,et al.  Aperture measurements and flow experiments on a single natural fracture , 1996 .

[2]  A new theory for the static contact between rough, unmated surfaces in non-elastically deforming rock and its implications for rock friction , 1989 .

[3]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Flow and tracer transport in a single fracture: A stochastic model and its relation to some field observations , 1988 .

[4]  A. Unger,et al.  NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE HYDROMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF TWO ROUGH FRACTURE SURFACES IN CONTACT , 1993 .

[5]  H. Squire,et al.  Laminar flow in symmetrical channels with slightly curved walls, I. On the Jeffery-Hamel solutions for flow between plane walls , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  F. Schmitt,et al.  Scaling invariance of crack surfaces , 1995 .

[7]  Brian P. Bonner,et al.  Self‐propping and fluid flow in slightly offset joints at high effective pressures , 1994 .

[8]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[9]  J. Gale,et al.  WATER FLOW IN A NATURAL ROCK FRACTURE AS A FUNCTION OF STRESS AND SAMPLE SIZE , 1985 .

[10]  Pierre M. Adler,et al.  FRACTURE DEFORMATION AND INFLUENCE ON PERMEABILITY , 1997 .

[11]  B. Mandelbrot Self-Affine Fractals and Fractal Dimension , 1985 .

[12]  Neville G. W. Cook,et al.  Natural joints in rock: Mechanical, hydraulic and seismic behaviour and properties under normal stress , 1992 .

[13]  Z. Warsi Fluid dynamics: theoretical and computational approaches , 1993 .

[14]  K. Novakowski,et al.  Preliminary interpretation of tracer experiments conducted in a discrete rock fracture under conditions of natural flow , 1995 .

[15]  C. David,et al.  Geometry of flow paths for fluid transport in rocks , 1993 .

[16]  T. A. Jones,et al.  Surface measurement and fractal characterization of naturally fractured rocks , 1992 .

[17]  Stephen R. Brown Simple mathematical model of a rough fracture , 1995 .

[18]  Louis Rosenhead,et al.  The steady two-dimensional radial flow of viscous fluid between two inclined plane walls , 1940, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  K. Raven,et al.  Interpretation of field tracer tests of a single fracture using a transient solute storage model , 1988 .

[20]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Channel model of flow through fractured media , 1987 .

[21]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  The effect of anisotropic surface roughness on flow and transport in fractures , 1991 .

[22]  Y. Maini In situ hydraulic parameters in jointed rock : their measurement and interpretation , 1972 .

[23]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Correlation between the surfaces of natural rock joints , 1986 .

[24]  T. Illangasekare,et al.  A mathematical model for flow and solute transport in non-homogeneous rock fractures , 1994 .

[25]  R. Adler,et al.  The Geometry of Random Fields , 1982 .

[26]  P. A. Witherspoon,et al.  Hydraulic And Mechanical Properties of Natural Fractures In Low Permeability Rock , 1987 .

[27]  C. Wang Drag due to a striated boundary in slow Couette flow , 1978 .

[28]  Terry E. Tullis,et al.  Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness , 1991 .

[29]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  The effect of contact area on the permeability of fractures , 1989 .

[30]  Alex Hansen,et al.  Study of fracture permeability using Lattice Gas Automata , 1995 .

[31]  Pierre M. Adler,et al.  Permeability of a Single Fracture; Validity of the Reynolds Equation , 1995 .

[32]  Gudmundur S. Bodvarsson,et al.  Lubrication theory analysis of the permeability of rough-walled fractures , 1991 .

[33]  Anders Rasmuson,et al.  Radionuclide Transport in Fast Channels in Crystalline Rock , 1986 .

[34]  Carl E. Renshaw,et al.  On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in rough-walled fractures , 1995 .

[35]  E. Hasegawa,et al.  On Steady Flow through a Channel Consisting of an Uneven Wall and a Plane Wall : Part 1. Case of No Relative Motion in Two Walls , 1983 .

[36]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[37]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Effective media theory with spatial correlation for flow in a fracture , 1997 .

[38]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces , 1985 .

[39]  L. J. Pyrak-Nolte,et al.  The fractal geometry of flow paths in natural fractures in rock and the approach to percolation , 1989 .

[40]  Analytical models for flow through obstructed domains , 1992 .

[41]  Shemin Ge,et al.  A governing equation for fluid flow in rough fractures , 1997 .

[42]  David D. Nolte,et al.  Fluid percolation through single fractures , 1988 .

[43]  Katsuhiko Iwai,et al.  Fundamental studies of fluid flow through a single fracture , 1976 .

[44]  Roux,et al.  Aperture of rough cracks. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[45]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness , 1987 .

[46]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Applicability of the Reynolds Equation for modeling fluid flow between rough surfaces , 1995 .

[47]  G. B. J. M. B.Sc. L. The two-dimensional steady motion of a viscous fluid , 1915 .

[48]  K. Raven,et al.  A Field Example of Measuring Hydrodynamic Dispersion in a Single Fracture , 1985 .