How does cognitive load influence speech perception? An encoding hypothesis

Two experiments investigated the conditions under which cognitive load exerts an effect on the acuity of speech perception. These experiments extend earlier research by using a different speech perception task (four-interval oddity task) and by implementing cognitive load through a task often thought to be modular, namely, face processing. In the cognitive-load conditions, participants were required to remember two faces presented before the speech stimuli. In Experiment 1, performance in the speech-perception task under cognitive load was not impaired in comparison to a no-load baseline condition. In Experiment 2, we modified the load condition minimally such that it required encoding of the two faces simultaneously with the speech stimuli. As a reference condition, we also used a visual search task that in earlier experiments had led to poorer speech perception. Both concurrent tasks led to decrements in the speech task. The results suggest that speech perception is affected even by loads thought to be processed modularly, and that, critically, encoding in working memory might be the locus of interference.

[1]  A. Samuel.  Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes , 1996 .

[2]  T. Lunner,et al.  The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[3]  S. Mattys,et al.  Effects of cognitive load on speech recognition , 2011 .

[4]  Joseph C. Toscano,et al.  Continuous Perception and Graded Categorization , 2010, Psychological science.

[5]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[6]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals , 1981, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[7]  A. Samuel,et al.  Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  J. Godfrey,et al.  Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. , 1981, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Memory updating in working memory : the role of the central executive , 1990 .

[10]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  Individual differences in late bilinguals' L2 phonological processes: From acoustic-phonetic analysis to lexical access , 2012 .

[11]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[12]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Models of verbal working memory capacity: what does it take to make them work? , 2012, Psychological review.

[14]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  A formal model of capacity limits in working memory , 2006 .

[15]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[16]  Arjan van Hessen,et al.  The end of categorical perception as we know it , 2003, Speech Commun..

[17]  M. Schouten,et al.  Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Alvin M. Liberman,et al.  Speech: A Special Code , 1996 .