Generalized time-energy uncertainty relations and bounds on lifetimes of resonances

A precise form of the quantum-mechanical time-energy uncertainty relation is derived. For any given initial state (density operator), time-dependent Hamiltonian, and subspace of reference states, it gives upper and lower bounds for the probability of finding the system in a state in that subspace at a later or earlier time. The bounds involve only the initial data, the energy uncertainty in the initial state, and the energy uncertainty in the reference subspace. They describe how fast the state enters or leaves the reference subspace. They are exact if, but not only if, the initial state or the projection onto the reference subspace commutes with the Hamiltonian. The basic tool used in the proof is a simple inequality for expectation values of commutators, which generalizes the usual uncertainty relation. By introducing suitable comparison dynamics (trial propagators), the bounds can be made arbitrarily tight. They represent a time-dependent variational principle, in terms of trial propagators, which provides explicit error estimates and reproduces the exact time evolution when one varies over all trial propagators. As illustrations, we derive accurate lower bounds on the escape time of a particle out of a potential well modeling a quantum dot, and the total time before which more » a He{sup +} ion moving in a uniform magnetic field loses its electron. « less

[1]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  A variational solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation , 1964 .

[2]  L. Thomas,et al.  Asymptotic behaviour of eigenfunctions for multiparticle Schrödinger operators , 1973 .

[3]  Knight,et al.  Schrödinger-cat states in the resonant Jaynes-Cummings model: Collapse and revival of oscillations of the photon-number distribution. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[4]  Kamal Bhattacharyya,et al.  Quantum decay and the Mandelstam-Tamm-energy inequality , 1983 .

[5]  E. Jaynes,et al.  Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser , 1962 .

[6]  P. Pfeifer A deductive approach to reduced dynamics and entropy in finite quantum systems , 2007 .

[7]  J. Gea-Banacloche A new look at the Jaynes-Cummings model for large fields: Bloch sphere evolution and detuning effects , 1992 .

[8]  Fertig Traversal-Time Distribution and the Uncertainty Principle in Quantum Tunneling. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[9]  J. Broeckhove,et al.  Time-dependent variational principles and conservation laws in wavepacket dynamics , 1989 .

[10]  A. R. P. Rau,et al.  A unified formulation of the construction of variational principles , 1983 .

[11]  M. Hoschneider Fractal wavelet dimensions and localization , 1994 .

[12]  Radiative decay versus photonic Jahn-Teller distortion of molecular states , 1982 .

[13]  Pfeifer How fast can a quantum state change with time? , 1993, Physical review letters.

[14]  Gea-Banacloche Loss of state purity and regularity in the Jaynes-Cummings model. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[15]  Averbukh Is Fractional revivals in the Jaynes-Cummings model. , 1992 .

[16]  G. Benettin,et al.  A Nekhoroshev-type theorem for Hamiltonian systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom , 1988 .

[17]  Andrei,et al.  Tunneling time and energy uncertainty of surface-state electrons. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  G. N. Fleming A unitarity bound on the evolution of nonstationary states , 1973 .

[19]  Antonio Giorgilli,et al.  Realization of holonomic constraints and freezing of high frequency degrees of freedom in the light of classical perturbation theory. Part II , 1987 .

[20]  J. Gea-Banacloche,et al.  Collapse and revival of the state vector in the Jaynes-Cummings model: An example of state preparation by a quantum apparatus. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[21]  J. Gea-Banacloche,et al.  Atom- and field-state evolution in the Jaynes-Cummings model for large initial fields. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[22]  Hegerfeldt Causality problems for Fermi's two-atom system. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[23]  N N Nekhoroshev,et al.  AN EXPONENTIAL ESTIMATE OF THE TIME OF STABILITY OF NEARLY-INTEGRABLE HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS , 1977 .

[24]  G. R. Allcock,et al.  The time of arrival in quantum mechanics I , 1969 .

[25]  Peter Pfeifer Erratum: How Fast Can a Quantum State Change with Time? [Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3365 (1993)] , 1993 .

[26]  W. Hunziker Resonances, metastable states and exponential decay laws in perturbation theory , 1990 .

[27]  Blankenbecler,et al.  Time in quantum measurements. , 1986, Physical review letters.

[28]  B. Sapoval,et al.  Vibrations of fractal drums. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[29]  E. H. Hauge,et al.  Tunneling times: a critical review , 1989 .

[30]  Kobe,et al.  Derivation of the energy-time uncertainty relation. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[31]  Geisel,et al.  Slow decay of temporal correlations in quantum systems with Cantor spectra. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[32]  Sapoval,et al.  Vibrations of strongly irregular or fractal resonators. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[33]  Wood,et al.  New form of the time-energy uncertainty relation. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[34]  David Ruelle,et al.  A remark on bound states in potential-scattering theory , 1969 .

[35]  J. Fröhlich,et al.  Gauge invariance and current algebra in nonrelativistic many body theory , 1993 .

[36]  Peter Pfeifer,et al.  A stationary formulation of time‐dependent problems in quantum mechanics , 1983 .

[37]  R. Salem On singular monotonic functions whose spectrum has a given Hausdorff dimension , 1951 .