From Face-to-Face to Paired Oral Proficiency Interviews: The Nut is Yet to be Cracked

The pressing need for English oral communication skills in multifarious contexts today is compelling impetus behind the large number of studies done on oral proficiency interviewing. Moreover, given the recently articulated concerns with the fairness and social dimension of such interviews, parallel concerns have been raised as to how most fairly to assess the oral communication skills of examinees, and what factors contribute to more skilled performance. This article sketches theory and practice on two rather competing formats of oral proficiency interviewing: face-to-face and paired. In the first place, it reviews the related literature on the alleged disadvantages of the individual format. Then, the pros and cons of the paired format are enumerated. It is discussed that the paired format has indeed met some of the criticisms leveled at individual oral proficiency interviewing. However, exploitation of the paired format as an undisputable alternative to the face-to-face format begs the question.

[1]  Carsten Roever,et al.  Language testing: The social dimension , 2006 .

[2]  T. McNamara.  Measuring Second Language Performance , 1996 .

[3]  P. Glover,et al.  Readers respond. Oral testing in pairs - secondary school perspective , 2001 .

[4]  Glenn Fulcher,et al.  Testing Second Language Speaking , 2003 .

[5]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Foundations of Social Psychology , 1967 .

[6]  J. Norton,et al.  The paired format in the Cambridge Speaking Tests , 2005 .

[7]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation , 1989 .

[8]  J. B. Heaton,et al.  Writing English Language Tests , 1988 .

[9]  Sari Luoma,et al.  Assessing Speaking: Developing test specifications , 2004 .

[10]  Grant Henning.  The ACTFL oral proficiency interview: Validity evidence , 1992 .

[11]  Gillian Wigglesworth,et al.  Are two heads better than one? Pair work in L2 assessment contexts , 2009 .

[12]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  The Discourse of Accommodation in Oral Proficiency Interviews , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[13]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  The Structural Organization of a Language Interview: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. , 1992 .

[14]  Lindsay Brooks,et al.  Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance , 2009 .

[15]  Elvira Swender,et al.  Oral Proficiency Testing in the Real World: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions , 2003 .

[16]  Michael C. Foot.  Relaxing in pairs , 1999 .

[17]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Proficiency: Understanding the Construct. , 1988 .

[18]  Dorry M. Kenyon,et al.  Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview , 1992 .

[19]  John L. D. Clark,et al.  “Screen-to-screen” testing: An exploratory study of oral proficiency interviewing using video teleconferencing , 1992 .