The naïve utility calculus: Joint inferences about the costs and rewards of actions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Baillargeon,et al. Do Infants Really Expect Agents to Act Efficiently? A Critical Test of the Rationality Principle , 2013, Psychological science.
[2] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Learning What is Where from Social Observations , 2012, CogSci.
[3] J. Tenenbaum,et al. Not So Innocent , 2015, Psychological science.
[4] OSVRTI I PRIKAZI,et al. Rational Choice , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.
[5] G. Csibra,et al. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] Dare A. Baldwin,et al. Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition , 2001 .
[7] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Bayesian Theory of Mind: Modeling Joint Belief-Desire Attribution , 2011, CogSci.
[8] Laura Schulz,et al. Running to do evil: Costs incurred by perpetrators affect moral judgment , 2014, CogSci.
[9] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Children’s understanding of the costs and rewards underlying rational action , 2015, Cognition.
[10] Chris L. Baker,et al. Action understanding as inverse planning , 2009, Cognition.
[11] J. J. Guajardo,et al. How infants make sense of intentional action , 2001 .