Rate-dependent elastic hysteresis during the peeling of pressure sensitive adhesives.

The modelling of the adherence energy during peeling of Pressure Sensitive Adhesives (PSA) has received much attention since the 1950's, uncovering several factors that aim at explaining their high adherence on most substrates, such as the softness and strong viscoelastic behaviour of the adhesive, the low thickness of the adhesive layer and its confinement by a rigid backing. The more recent investigation of adhesives by probe-tack methods also revealed the importance of cavitation and stringing mechanisms during debonding, underlining the influence of large deformations and of the related non-linear response of the material, which also intervenes during peeling. Although a global modelling of the complex coupling of all these ingredients remains a formidable issue, we report here some key experiments and modelling arguments that should constitute an important step forward. We first measure a non-trivial dependence of the adherence energy on the loading geometry, namely through the influence of the peeling angle, which is found to be separable from the peeling velocity dependence. This is the first time to our knowledge that such adherence energy dependence on the peeling angle is systematically investigated and unambiguously demonstrated. Secondly, we reveal an independent strong influence of the large strain rheology of the adhesives on the adherence energy. We complete both measurements with a microscopic investigation of the debonding region. We discuss existing modellings in light of these measurements and of recent soft material mechanics arguments, to show that the adherence energy during peeling of PSA should not be associated to the propagation of an interfacial stress singularity. The relevant deformation mechanisms are actually located over the whole adhesive thickness, and the adherence energy during peeling of PSA should rather be associated to the energy loss by viscous friction and by rate-dependent elastic hysteresis.

[1]  H. Pfeiffer.  Transactions of the Society of Rheology , 1958 .

[2]  D. J. Yarusso.  Quantifying the Relationship Between Peel and Rheology for Pressure Sensitive Adhesives , 1999 .

[3]  A. Gent,et al.  Effect of Wetting Liquids on the Strength of Adhesion of Viscoelastic Material , 1972 .

[4]  N. Amouroux,et al.  Role of Interfacial Resistance to Shear Stress on Adhesive Peel Strength , 2001 .

[5]  D. Kaelble,et al.  Theory and analysis of peel adhesion: Rate-temperature dependence of viscoelastic interlayers , 1964 .

[6]  G. I. Barenblatt.  THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM CRACKS IN BRITTLE FRACTURE , 1962 .

[7]  A. Jagota,et al.  Crack blunting and the strength of soft elastic solids , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Alan N. Gent,et al.  Internal rupture of bonded rubber cylinders in tension , 1961, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  R. R. Myers,et al.  Transactions of the Society of Rheology , 1957 .

[10]  D. H. Kaelble,et al.  Theory and Analysis of Peel Adhesion: Bond Stresses and Distributions , 1960 .

[11]  D. Kaelble.  Theory and analysis of peel adhesion : adhesive thickness effects , 1992 .

[12]  B. Newby,et al.  Effect of Interfacial Slippage on Viscoelastic Adhesion , 1997 .

[13]  D. Kaelble.  Peel Adhesion: Micro‐Fracture Mechanics of Interfacial Unbonding of Polymers , 1965 .

[14]  Hamed Lakrout,et al.  Direct Observation of Cavitation and Fibrillation in a Probe Tack Experiment on Model Acrylic Pressure-Sensitive-Adhesives , 1999 .

[15]  L. Vanel,et al.  Peeling-angle dependence of the stick-slip instability during adhesive tape peeling. , 2014, Soft matter.

[16]  A. Chiche,et al.  Surface energy effects for cavity growth and nucleation in an incompressible neo-Hookean material––modeling and experiment , 2004 .

[17]  L. Vanel,et al.  Strong dynamical effects during stick-slip adhesive peeling. , 2013, Soft matter.

[18]  B. Persson,et al.  Crack propagation in viscoelastic solids. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  C. Fretigny,et al.  Adhesive contact of elastomers: effective adhesion energy and creep function , 2009, 0906.2078.

[20]  T. Hata.  Mechanisms of Adhesive Failure , 1972 .

[21]  D. S. Dugdale.  Yielding of steel sheets containing slits , 1960 .

[22]  D. Maugis,et al.  Subcritical crack growth, surface energy, fracture toughness, stick-slip and embrittlement , 1985 .

[23]  A. Needleman.  A Continuum Model for Void Nucleation by Inclusion Debonding , 1987 .

[24]  Richard Schapery,et al.  A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media , 1975 .

[25]  A. Gent,et al.  Peel mechanics for an elastic‐plastic adherend , 1977 .

[26]  J. Ferry.  Viscoelastic properties of polymers , 1961 .

[27]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[28]  T. L. Smith.  Dependence of the ultimate properties of a GR‐S rubber on strain rate and temperature , 1958 .

[29]  Matteo Ciccotti,et al.  Intermittent stick-slip dynamics during the peeling of an adhesive tape from a roller. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Stress Distribution during Peeling of Adhesive Tapes , 1981 .

[31]  P. Tordjeman,et al.  Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 2. The interfacial fracture domains , 1998 .

[32]  B. Lestriez,et al.  Adhesive and Rheological Properties of Lightly Crosslinked Model Acrylic Networks , 2006 .

[33]  A. Gent,et al.  Adhesion of viscoelastic materials to rigid substrates , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[34]  K. Kendall.  Thin-film peeling-the elastic term , 1975 .

[35]  P. Tordjeman,et al.  Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 1. Cohesive fracture , 1997 .

[36]  W. Cox,et al.  Correlation of dynamic and steady flow viscosities , 1958 .

[37]  R. Rivlin,et al.  Rupture of rubber. I. Characteristic energy for tearing , 1953 .

[38]  A. Chiche,et al.  Cavity growth in soft adhesives , 2005, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.