Catheter manipulation analysis for objective performance and technical skills assessment in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

PurposeTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) demands precise and efficient handling of surgical instruments within the confines of the aortic anatomy. Operational performance and dexterous skills are critical for patient safety, and objective methods are assessed with a number of manipulation features, derived from the kinematic analysis of the catheter/guidewire in fluoroscopy video sequences.MethodsA silicon phantom model of a type I aortic arch was used for this study. Twelve endovascular surgeons, divided into two experience groups, experts ($$n=6$$n=6) and novices ($$n=6$$n=6), performed cannulation of the aorta, representative of valve placement in TAVI. Each participant completed two TAVI experiments, one with conventional catheters and one with the Magellan robotic platform. Video sequences of the fluoroscopic monitor were recorded for procedural processing. A semi-automated tracking software provided the 2D coordinates of the catheter/guidewire tip. In addition, the aorta phantom was segmented in the videos and the shape of the entire catheter was manually annotated in a subset of the available video frames using crowdsourcing. The TAVI procedure was divided into two stages, and various metrics, representative of the catheter’s overall navigation as well as its relative movement to the vessel wall, were developed.ResultsExperts consistently exhibited lower values of procedure time and dimensionless jerk, and higher average speed and acceleration than novices. Robotic navigation resulted in increased average distance to the vessel wall in both groups, a surrogate measure of safety and reduced risk of embolisation. Discrimination of experience level and types of equipment was achieved with the generated motion features and established clustering algorithms.ConclusionsEvaluation of surgical skills is possible through the analysis of the catheter/guidewire motion pattern. The use of robotic endovascular platforms seems to enable more precise and controlled catheter navigation.

[1]  Mohamad Hamady,et al.  The use of robotic endovascular catheters in the facilitation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[2]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  Towards automated surgical skill evaluation of endovascular catheterization tasks based on force and motion signatures , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[3]  Jean Bismuth,et al.  Kinematics effectively delineate accomplished users of endovascular robotics with a physical training model. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  Fan-Tien Cheng,et al.  A Scheme of High-Dimensional Key-Variable Search Algorithms for Yield Improvement , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[5]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  D. Stoyanov,et al.  A pilot study of video-motion analysis in endovascular surgery: development of real-time discriminatory skill metrics. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[8]  Danail Stoyanov,et al.  The Role of 3D Fusion Computed Tomography in the Enhancement of the Safety Profile of FEVAR , 2015 .

[9]  Colin D. Bicknell,et al.  Robust Catheter and Guidewire Tracking Using B-Spline Tube Model and Pixel-Wise Posteriors , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[10]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  Assessment of Navigation Cues with Proximal Force Sensing during Endovascular Catheterization , 2012, MICCAI.

[11]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching and testing technical skills. , 1993, American journal of surgery.

[12]  A. Darzi,et al.  Endovascular skills training and assessment. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  C. Thiemermann,et al.  Trauma alarmins as activators of damage‐induced inflammation , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  Su-Lin Lee,et al.  Learning-Based Modeling of Endovascular Navigation for Collaborative Robotic Catheterization , 2013, MICCAI.

[15]  N. Cheshire,et al.  The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  A. Darzi,et al.  Assessing operative skill , 1999, BMJ.

[17]  Susheel Kodali,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Danail Stoyanov,et al.  Video motion analysis for objective assessment in catheter-based endovascular intervention , 2012 .

[19]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  Reducing contact forces in the arch and supra-aortic vessels using the Magellan robot. , 2016, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  A systematic review of assessment of skill acquisition and operative competency in vascular surgical training. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  A Darzi,et al.  Validation of video-based skill assessment in carotid artery stenting. , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[22]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  On the development of objective metrics for surgical skills evaluation based on tool motion , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[23]  Henry C. Lin,et al.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[24]  A. Darzi,et al.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.