The Decentralization of Management Science and the Birth of Self-Starters

In this paper, the authors provide a commentary on current trends in management science. This commentary is based largely on US experience gleaned from published material. This material indicates that the environment of management science is rapidly changing. Personal computers, end-user computing, the information centre, other information system elements and the general competitive state of many US organizations provide significant changes. Opportunities for interdisciplinary activity, through decision support systems, expert systems, strategic planning and material requirements planning, exist even more than in the past. This opportunity for growth may occur through ‘self-starters’. Self-starters are line managers who develop their own management science projects without direction from above or the direct assistance of management science staff. The current environment, the decentralization of management science and the birth of self-starters are discussed, as well as implications of this trend.

[1]  Robert K. Wysocki,et al.  OR/MS Implementation Research: A Bibliography , 1979 .

[2]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[3]  D. Schendel,et al.  A Strategic Model of the U.S. Brewing Industry: 1952-1971 , 1978 .

[4]  Herman Cain.  The Intangibles of Implementation , 1979 .

[5]  Gary L. Lilien.  Editorial: MS/OR on Thin Ice , 1985 .

[6]  Geoff Lockett,et al.  Attitudes and Perceptions Relating to Implementation and Success in Operational Research , 1982 .

[7]  Dana S. Nau,et al.  Expert computer systems , 1983, Computer.

[8]  H. T. Norrington.  A Banker's View of Operational Research , 1984 .

[9]  John F. Rockart,et al.  The management of end user computing , 1983, CACM.

[10]  Benjamin Lev.  Management Science Process---Requiem for an Operations Research Project , 1980 .

[11]  William C. Wedley,et al.  Perceptual Differences and Effects of Managerial Participation on Project Implementation , 1978 .

[12]  R. Ackoff.  The Future of Operational Research is Past , 1979 .

[13]  J. F. Rockart,et al.  The CEO goes on-line , 1989 .

[14]  John P. Phillips.  MS Implementation: A Parable , 1979 .

[15]  Howard Feldman,et al.  Management Science—Theory, Relevance, and Practice in the 1980s , 1983 .

[16]  Biman Das,et al.  Effects of Production Feedback and Standards on Worker Productivity in a Repetitive Production Task , 1982 .

[17]  Leonard Adelman.  Involving Users in the Development of Decision-Analytic Aids: The Principal Factor in Successful Implementation , 1982 .

[18]  S. Eilon,et al.  The Role of Management Science , 1980, The Journal of the Operational Research Society.

[19]  Sidney W. Hess,et al.  OR/MS: Dead or Dying? RX for Survival , 1978 .

[20]  James R. Freeland,et al.  Structuring Information Flow to Enhance Innovation , 1972 .

[21]  Geoff Lockett.  Implementation Exchange: Self-Starters in MS/OR—A Growth Area , 1984 .

[22]  Guy Sitruk.  A Constantly Evolving O.R. Team , 1983 .

[23]  A. H. Schainblatt,et al.  The Researcher and The Manager: A Dialectic of Implementation , 1965 .

[24]  Stuart S. Nagel.  MS/OR Utilization in Public Policy Making , 1984 .

[25]  Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al.  Can MS/OR Evolve Fast Enough? , 1983 .

[26]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Resurrecting the Future of Operational Research , 1979 .

[27]  Bayard E. Wynne.  A Domination Sequence—MS/OR; DSS; and the Fifth Generation , 1984 .