Digital Piracy: A Competitive Analysis

In recent years, the issue of copyright protection for intellectual properties such as computer software, music CDs, and videos has become increasingly important. It is often claimed that illegal copying of intellectual property costs companies billions of dollars in lost revenues and reduces firms' incentives to innovate. Some researchers have shown that copying can be beneficial to firms when there are strong network effects and copying expands the market. In this paper, we first examine the impact of illegal copying of software and other similar intellectual properties on firms' prices, profits, and quality choices, even when there are no network effects and the market is saturated. We show that contrary to the claims of manufacturers, there are conditions under which copying can increase firms' profits, lead to better quality products, and increase social welfare. This is because weaker copyright protection enables firms to reduce price competition by allowing price-sensitive consumers to copy. Thus, weaker copyright protection can serve as a coordination device to reduce price competition. We also examine how equilibrium copyright enforcement is affected by network externalities. In contrast to previous research, we show that strong network effects can sometimes lead to a firm choosing higher levels of copyright protection. Our results show that in the presence of strong network effects, stronger copyright enforcement by one firm can serve as a coordinating device to reduce price competition.

[1]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Software Piracy: Estimation of Lost Sales and the Impact on Software Diffusion , 1995 .

[2]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[3]  Devavrat Purohit,et al.  What Should You Do When Your Competitors Send in the Clones , 1994 .

[4]  Oz Shy,et al.  A strategic approach to software protection , 1999 .

[5]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Bertrand Supertraps , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Ivan P. L. Png,et al.  Price Discrimination through Offers to Match Price , 1987 .

[7]  Neil Gandal,et al.  NETWORK EFFECTS, SOFTWARE PROVISION, AND STANDARDIZATION* , 1992 .

[8]  E. Maskin,et al.  The Existence of Equilibrium in Discontinuous Economic Games, I: Theory , 1986 .

[9]  Baohong Sun,et al.  Product Strategy for Innovators in Markets with Network Effects , 2004 .

[10]  Volker Schneider,et al.  Business Software Alliance , 2009 .

[11]  Z. John Zhang,et al.  Competitive Coupon Targeting , 1995 .

[12]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Cross-Market Network Effect with Asymmetric Customer Loyalty: Implications for Competitive Advantage , 2007 .

[13]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  How many pirates should a software firm tolerate? An analysis of piracy protection on the diffusion of software , 2003 .

[14]  Martin Peitz A Strategic Approach to Software Protection: Comment , 2004 .

[15]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities , 1995 .

[16]  S. Besen,et al.  Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties , 1989, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[17]  Kallol Kumar Bagchi,et al.  Global software piracy , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[18]  K. R. Conner,et al.  Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies , 1991 .

[19]  K. R. Conner,et al.  Obtaining Strategic Advantage from Being Imitated: When Can Encouraging Clones Pay? , 1995 .

[20]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  The Effect of Piracy on the Market Penetration of Subscription Software , 2004 .

[21]  H. Varian Journal of Economic Perspectives. , 2004 .

[22]  Invited Commentary---The Day After Tomorrow: Longer Run Issues in Theatrical Exhibition , 2006 .

[23]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  The Fat-Cat Effect, the Puppy-Dog Ploy, and the Lean and Hungry Look , 1984 .

[24]  Michael Waldman,et al.  The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  S. Liebowitz Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[27]  Ram D. Gopal,et al.  Preventive and Deterrent Controls for Software Piracy , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  K. Hui,et al.  Piracy and the Legitimate Demand for Recorded Music , 2002 .

[29]  V. Mahajan,et al.  How Much Anti-Piracy Effort is Too Much? - a Study of the Global Software Industry , 2005 .

[30]  Joydeep Srivastava,et al.  An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Price-Matching Refund Policies , 2000 .

[31]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Managing Digital Piracy: Pricing and Protection , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  William R. Johnson,et al.  The Economics of Copying , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  Xiaotong Li Cheap Talk and Bogus Network Externalities in the Emerging Technology Market , 2005 .

[34]  Lisa N. Takeyama The Welfare Implications of Unauthorized Reproduction of Intellectual Property in the Presence of Demand Network Externalities , 1994 .

[35]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  The morality of software piracy: A cross-cultural analysis , 1990 .

[36]  Florian Zettelmeyer,et al.  Expanding to the Internet: Pricing and Communications Strategies When Firms Compete on Multiple Channels , 2000 .

[37]  Hsing K. Cheng,et al.  To Purchase or to Pirate Software: An Empirical Study , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..