Line Codes for Digital Subscriber Lines

1 HE SELECTION OF A LINE CODE FOR ANY TELEphone transmission system is critical to its performance. This is particularly true for the ISDN Basic Access Digital Subscriber Line (DSL). In this application, the line code affects the determinants of system performance in a crucial way, the principal reason being that the line code is instrumental in determining both the transmission characteristics of the transmitted signals and the added near-end crosstalk noise levels on other pairs in the same cable. Further, it is required that the DSL perform with a Bit Error Ratio (BER) of less than lo-' over essentially all of the non-loaded loop plant [l] in the North American wire pair plant. The complexity of this plant is exemplified in Figure 1, which gives three representative samples of the structures of loops from the 10% lossiest loops in the population. The bridged taps and gauge changes in these loops lead to substantial transmission losses because of reflected energy, intersymbol interference contributed by multiple reflections and transmission distortion, and echoes back to the transmitting end of the line. The insertion losses of these loops at frequencies of interest are shown in Figure 2. In order to economically provide Basic Access, the DSL must be implemented without conditioning the plant (e.g., by

[1]  David G. Messerschmitt Asynchronous and Timing Jitter Insensitive Data Echo Cancellation , 1986, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  David D. Falconer,et al.  Timing Jitter Effects on Digital Subscriber Loop Echo Cancellers: Part I - Analysis of the Effect , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  Kenneth Steiglitz,et al.  for Data Communications in the Presence 01 Crosstalk , 2022 .

[4]  G. J. Foschini,et al.  Contrasting performance of faster binary signaling with QAM , 1984, AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal.

[5]  John M. Cioffi,et al.  Spectrally constrained codes for high rate ISDN subscriber loop , 1988, IEEE International Conference on Communications, - Spanning the Universe..

[6]  G. P. Dudevoir,et al.  Vector coding for partial response channels , 1988, MILCOM 88, 21st Century Military Communications - What's Possible?'. Conference record. Military Communications Conference.

[7]  P. A. Franaszek,et al.  Sequence-state coding for digital transmission , 1968 .

[8]  David D. Falconer Timing Jitter Effects on Digital Subscriber Loop Echo Cancellers: Part II - Considerations for Squaring Loop Timing Recovery , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[9]  Joseph W. Lechleider,et al.  Spectrum Management in Telephone Loop Cables, II: Signal Constraints That Depend on Shape , 1986, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[10]  David G. Messerschmitt,et al.  Nonlinear Echo Cancellation of Data Signals , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  O. Agazzi,et al.  Large-Scale Integration of Hybrid-Method Digital Subscriber Loops , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[12]  Peter Kabal,et al.  Partial-Response Signaling , 1975, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[13]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  Oversampled Sigma-Delta Modulation , 1987, IEEE Trans. Commun..