Cognitive operations associated with individual differences in affect intensity.

There are wide individual differences in the characteristic intensity of affective response to the same emotion-evoking event. The processes whereby individuals come to experience strong or mild emotional responses when exposed to the same affect-provoking stimuli are still unclear. In these studies, we propose that individual differences in affect intensity are associated with certain cognitive operations used during exposure to emotion-relevant stimuli. Specifically, cognitive operations that involve personalizing, generalizing, and selective abstraction were hypothesized to discriminate subjects high and low in affect intensity. Two studies replicated support for the hypothesis that subjects high on the affect-intensity dimension engage in more personalizing/empathic and more generalizing/elaborative cognitive operations than do subjects low on the affect-intensity dimension. The same cognitive operations discriminated groups high and low in affect intensity in response to both positive and negative emotional stimuli. Also, the cognitions that discriminated subjects high and low in affect intensity occurred only in response to affective stimuli; neutral stimuli did not evoke divergent cognitive operations for these two groups. Finally, a high degree of consistency was found in the use of emotion-relevant cognitive operations across positive and negative affective stimuli.

[1]  R. Larsen The stability of mood variability: A spectral analytic approach to daily mood assessments. , 1987 .

[2]  R. Larsen,et al.  Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review , 1987 .

[3]  Ed Diener,et al.  Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. , 1986 .

[4]  S. Folkman,et al.  Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R. Carlson,et al.  Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotions, Relationships, and Health. , 1986 .

[6]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Behavioral inhibition and electrodermal activity during deception. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  J. Teasdale,et al.  Constraints on the Effects of Mood on Memory , 1985 .

[8]  R. Larsen,et al.  Intensity and frequency: dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  D. Kirschenbaum,et al.  Affect and adult self-regulation. , 1985 .

[10]  R. Larsen,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod examination of affect structure: hedonic level and emotional intensity , 1985 .

[11]  C. Carver,et al.  Self-Consciousness and Self-Assessment , 1985 .

[12]  R. Larsen,et al.  Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  A. Isen,et al.  Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. , 1984 .

[14]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  The psychology of physical symptoms , 1982 .

[15]  J. Exner,et al.  Dimensions of personality , 1978 .

[16]  A. Isen,et al.  Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: a cognitive loop? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[18]  A. Beck Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders: A. T. Beck , 1987, British Journal of Psychiatry.