The Relationship of Three Cortical Regions to an Information-Processing Model

This research tests a model of the computational role of three cortical regions in tasks like algebra equation solving. The model assumes that there is a left parietal region-of-interest (ROI) where the problem expression is represented and transformed, a left prefrontal ROI where information for solving the task is retrieved, and a motor ROI where hand movements to produce the answer are programmed. A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of an abstract symbolmanipulation task was performed to articulate the roles of these three regions. Participants learned to associate words with instructions for transforming strings of letters. The study manipulated the need to retrieve these instructions, the need to transform the strings, and whether there was a delay between calculation of the answer and the output of the answer. As predicted, the left parietal ROI mainly reflected the need for a transformation and the left prefrontal ROI the need for retrieval. Homologous right ROIs showed similar but weaker responses. Neither the prefrontal nor the parietal ROIs responded to delay, but the motor ROI did respond to delay, implying motor rehearsal over the delay. Except for the motor ROI, these patterns of activity did not vary with response hand. In an ACT-R model, it was shown that the activity of an imaginal buffer predicted the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response of the parietal ROI, the activity of a retrieval buffer predicted the response of the prefrontal ROI, and the activity of a manual buffer predicted the response of the motor ROI.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Tracing Problem Solving in Real Time: fMRI Analysis of the Subject-paced Tower of Hanoi , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Schacter,et al.  Prefrontal Contributions to Executive Control: fMRI Evidence for Functional Distinctions within Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2001, NeuroImage.

[3]  P. Roland,et al.  Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Buckner,et al.  Dissociating State and Item Components of Recognition Memory Using fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[6]  R. Henson,et al.  Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Working Memory: Activation Limitations on Retrieval , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[9]  John R. Anderson,et al.  An information-processing model of the BOLD response in symbol manipulation tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The Neural Bases of Strategy and Skill in Sentence–Picture Verification , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  S. Sternberg Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[12]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[13]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[14]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  M. Just,et al.  Computational modeling of high‐level cognition and brain function , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[16]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[17]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Recovering Meaning Left Prefrontal Cortex Guides Controlled Semantic Retrieval , 2001, Neuron.

[18]  Florin Dolcos,et al.  Similarities and Differences in the Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory Retrieval and Working Memory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  How people learn to skip steps. , 1996 .

[20]  Myeong-Ho Sohn,et al.  An information-processing model of three cortical regions: evidence in episodic memory retrieval , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  John R Anderson,et al.  Extraction of overt verbal response from the acoustic noise in a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan by use of segmented active noise cancellation , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[27]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[28]  S. Petersen,et al.  Frontal cortex contributes to human memory formation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Annemie Van der Linden,et al.  A comparison between blood oxygenation level‐dependent and cerebral blood volume contrast in the rat cerebral and cerebellar somatosensoric cortex during electrical paw stimulation , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.